Skip to content

Author

Ahmad Hassanat

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

A Sign-Symmetric Reformulation of the Hassanat Distance for Data with Negative Feature Values

The Hassanat Distance (HasD) is a bounded, non-convex metric widely used in k-nearest-neighbor (KNN) classification for its robustness to noise, outliers, and heterogeneous feature scales. Its definition, however, breaks a natural symmetry: through a sign-dependent shift it assigns different distances to mirror-image pairs such as (1,2) and (−1,−2), distorting neighborhoods exactly in the value ranges that modern preprocessing (z-scoring, principal component analysis (PCA), learned embeddings) produces. We introduce the Sign-Symmetric Hassanat Distance (SHasD), a single branch-free formula D(a,b)=|a−b|/(1+max(|a|,|b|)) that is invariant under the reflection x↦−x, coincides exactly with HasD on non-negative data, and removes the conditional shift entirely. We prove SHasD is a metric, and we derive a range-normalized companion, SHasD-R, that additionally restores ray monotonicity and the [0,1) per-dimension bound. On 23 datasets across three normalization regimes and ten distance measures, SHasD improves significantly on HasD on data containing negative values (mean gain +1.1 percentage points, up to +7.4; Wilcoxon p=0.0026, Holm-corrected) and attains the best mean rank of the compared measures on signed, heavy-tailed, outlier-rich data, while preserving HasD’s robustness. An additive per-dimension decomposition yields a built-in interpretation of every prediction.

Mohammad Saad Alaydaa, Gaseb N. Alotibi, Ahmad S. Tarawneh et al. · 0 citations
Open access Jul 2026

On the Optimality of k=n in k-Nearest Neighbor Classification: Sub-Optimality Rates, Dimension-Aware Selection, and Hassanat Distance Comparison

The theoretical results provide a principled non-cross-validated alternative to the classical n rule, and cross-validation remains the strongest k-selection strategy when computationally feasible.

Ahmad Hassanat, A. A. Alkasasbeh, Esra’a Alkafaween et al. · 1 citation