Skip to content

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Jul 2026

Multi-way radial consistency pre-training for event based optical flow

Optical flow estimation is a low-level module in computer vision, widely used in tasks such as visual odometry, autonomous driving, high dynamic range (HDR) imaging, and action recognition. Existing event-based optical flow estimation approaches suffer from scarcity of dense real-world datasets, while some unsupervised frameworks have reduced reliance on large-scale datasets by forward-backward consistency loss, they primarily exploit a 1D temporal reversal, while largely ignoring the rotational and scaling motions ubiquitous in robotics and automotive scenes. This work introduces radial consistency, a self-supervised pre-training framework that maps the event stream to log-polar coordinates and tessellates the spatial domain into K radial rings and L angular sectors, a shared encoder-decoder to predict four complementary flow fields whose cyclic sum is driven to zero, yielding a closed-loop constraint that generalizes the classical forward-backward check to 360° within a sector. Our core contribution, the radial consistency loss, is completely label-free, together with auxiliary terms, enabling self-supervised pre-training on large-scale event data. We optionally apply supervised fine-tuning on small labeled sets to adapt to specific domains, achieving competitive accuracy with fully supervised methods. Validation experiments on Multi Vehicle Stereo Event Camera (MVSEC) dataset demonstrate strong performance: our method achieves 0.67 EPE averaged across all sequences, surpassing E-RAFT (0.89 EPE) and EV-FlowNet (1.10 EPE), without any additional data. On the rotation-heavy indoor_flying3 sequence specifically, we achieve 0.93 EPE (fine-tuned) and 1.49 EPE (self-supervised only) vs. E-RAFT 1.66. We also improve upon E-RAFT in computational efficiency [55 frames per second (FPS) and 26 giga floating-point operations (GFLOPs) vs. 42 FPS and 38 GFLOPs], while requiring only minimal supervised fine-tuning.

An Feng, Wenyin Tao · 0 citations