This work designed a tool called dBlocks with the following features: blocks to scope content, a context manager to edit context, and inline execution to verify code, and shows how human-centered design can guide the development of LLM-integrated tools.
This thesis proposes malleable interfaces for documentation review, where practitioners reshape interfaces to fit their work rather than adapting to fixed tool interfaces, and proposes to build a review environment where practitioners describe interface needs in natural language, and the system generates views to accom...
This position paper uses systems thinking to trace how agent-mediated information seeking disrupts the balancing loops that currently contribute to documentation quality and how this disruption would create reinforcing loops that degrade documentation and code quality over time.
Avinash Bhat, Jin L. C. Guo· SIGSOFT FSE Companion· 1 citation
The work identifies five distinct stages of the documentation review process: self review, technical review, editorial review, play testing, and post-publication feedback, and draws on practitioners with distinct expertise to address quality across content, presentation, and user experience.
Avinash Bhat, Ian Arawjo, Disha Shrivastava et al.· 1 citation· ⚡1
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.