We have 6 of 22 papers
We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.
Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.
This work evaluates three commit-time guard granularities (global epoch, read-set version, semantic commit predicate), multi-level verification, and model-side gates on three locally hosted quantized model families, and investigates how precisely runtime guards distinguish invalidating races.
Agentic systems commit state-changing actions, but additional verifiers can inherit the same upstream fault. We present VP-CONTROL, a runtime-assurance design and deterministic benchmark for cost-aware commit gates. Its 48 task templates yield 2,880 scenarios across six fault regimes. A fixed-call 2 x 2 experiment sepa...
Financial AI systems often train information extractors on one textual register and deploy them across filings, news, and user-generated content, and standard F1 scores do not indicate which predictions remain safe to automate when that input distribution changes. We study confidence estimation and selective prediction...
An episode-level evaluation protocol for healthcare NLP agents is introduced, supplying a reproducible intermediate evaluation layer between static benchmarks and prospective workflow studies, with an explicit cost-sensitive treatment of missed versus unnecessary escalation.
The memory-clarification boundary is studied: whether interaction-derived information should be persisted, used only in the current context, re-verified, or clarified with the user, as well as across Claude and Qwen.
It is argued that public tutoring benchmarks can better support positive-impact evaluation by reporting solving-oriented and pedagogy-oriented scores separately and by making disclosure-sensitive, student-agency-preserving criteria more explicit.
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.
