Comparison of Ciprofol and Propofol on Postoperative Quality of Recovery and Intraoperative Cerebral Oxygen Saturation in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopic Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Non-Inferiority Trial
Purpose Ciprofol provides more stable induction, though its impact on patients’ quality of recovery (QoR) and brain oxygenation requires clarification. This trial assessed whether propofol anesthesia is non-inferior to ciprofol regarding postoperative recovery quality, while additionally comparing their effects on intraoperative cerebral oxygenation. Patients and Methods This single-center, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority study involved 94 patients scheduled for elective surgery, randomized equally to receive ciprofol (Group C) or propofol (Group P). The primary outcome was the global QoR-15 score measured 24 hours after surgery, with a non-inferiority threshold set at −6.0. Secondary outcomes included 48-hour QoR-15 scores, injection pain frequency, vasopressor requirements, and regional cerebral oxygen saturation (rScO2). Results Eighty- eight patients completed the study (Group C: 44; Group P: 44). In ITT analysis, the mean QoR-15 score at 24 hours for Group C was non-inferior to Group P (Pnon-inferiority < 0.001), with consistent findings in the PP analysis. Similar non-inferiority was observed at 48 hours. However, Group C experienced a notably lower rate of injection pain (4.5% vs 59.0%, P < 0.001) and required less phenylephrine (P = 0.009). Although Group P had higher heart rates after induction of anesthesia (P < 0.05), its average arterial pressure was notably reduced (P < 0.05). Notably, rScO2 in group C was higher than that in group P after induction of anesthesia (P = 0.046) and during the anesthesia maintenance phase (P < 0.05). Conclusion Ciprofol is non-inferior to propofol regarding early postoperative recovery quality. Furthermore, ciprofol mitigates injection pain, reduces vasoconstrictor requirements, and better maintains cerebral oxygenation.