Existing agentic approaches for recommendation system optimization remain fundamentally reactive: they adjust parameters in response to observed metric changes but lack the ability to proactively design controlled experiments, personalize strategies at the user-segment level, or accumulate reusable experimental methodology across tasks. We present PILOT (Proactive Insight Learner for Online Tree-Experiments), an LLM-agent framework that organizes three roles within a constrained control loop where deterministic services enforce all safety, statistical, and permission boundaries: (1) an Experiment Manager that drives the full experiment lifecycle -- task intake, observation governance, anomaly recovery, and postmortem -- by selecting only from a rule-generated legal-command envelope; (2) a Search Planner that proposes candidate decision trees for user-segment-level personalization, invoked only when the Manager requests planning; and (3) a Memory Curator that asynchronously distills experiment outcomes into strategy-level domain knowledge and provenance-tracked methodology, failure-isolated from the main loop. The Manager makes the agent proactive, the Planner enables population-level personalization beyond global tuning, and the Curator turns every completed task into a learning opportunity for the next. Deployed on Taobao's platform with 5 experimental buckets, PILOT is compared against ROAM(Reactive Optimization with Agent-driven Moves), a free-exploration agent without lifecycle governance or structured hypothesis testing. PILOT achieves up to +1.40% IPV, +1.60% Core IPV, +0.96% transaction count, and +1.50% transaction amount, improving over ROAM's best results (+1.00% IPV, +0.90% Core IPV, +0.60% transaction count, +1.13% transaction amount) while raising search efficiency from 53.3% to 93.3% (+40 pp), with no human intervention throughout the experimental cycle.
Jiuning Lin, Ruiquan Lan, Xiaodong Zhu et al.· 0 citations
Industrial recommender systems rank heterogeneous content under coupled user, business, commercial, and experience objectives. Existing generative ranking methods typically construct item sequences directly, making them difficult to integrate with mature predictive models, operational rules, and field-level guardrails. We present MetaStrategy, a framework that instead generates a structured, executable ranking strategy. Conditioned on request context, a large language model (LLM) policy emits a typed JSON bundle controlling objective weights, content and category preferences, experience constraints, and position policies. A deterministic validator and compiler instantiate an isolated Generator that competes atomically with incumbents under the list-level Evaluator of the Generator-Evaluator (GE) architecture. We train the policy in a production-path replay environment that re-executes logged requests through the current re-ranking stack without user exposure. The method combines selection, relative-rank, and baseline-lift rewards, a self-competitive curriculum that feeds frequent strategies back as competitors, and Evaluator-routed reward-augmented on-policy distillation that transfers complementary 4B-parameter Teachers into a compact 0.8B-parameter Student. We deploy MetaStrategy in Taobao Homepage Guess You Like through diff-triggered nearline generation; LLM inference remains outside synchronous ranking, with no observable increase in response time (RT). In a seven-day user-randomized online A/B test, MetaStrategy wins 27.93% of treatment-side GE calls and significantly improves click page views (click PV) by 2.11%, item-detail page views (IPV) by 3.12%, and transaction amount by 2.83%.
Chengyu Lai, Jiuning Lin, Zhibo Xiao et al.· 0 citations