On-policy self-distillation (OPSD) adapts a language model by distilling guidance from a frozen teacher on trajectories sampled from the student. Its effectiveness, however, depends critically on the quality of those trajectories. We show that when student rollouts drift from target trajectories, conditioning the teacher on off-target prefixes substantially weakens its task-relevant supervision. Controlled prefix-corruption experiments expose this failure mode, which we term rollout-conditioned signal degradation. To address this problem, we propose a unified training framework that separates two complementary supervision pathways. The first retains rollout-conditioned distribution matching, providing guidance on states the student actually visits. The second applies supervised cross-entropy on canonical ground-truth contexts, avoiding the incompatibility of imposing target tokens on erroneous rollout prefixes. Token-level rollout-target alignment is used to adapt the strength of the canonical-context anchor, emphasizing it during cold start and relaxing it as rollout quality improves. Experiments across multiple model scales, two task families, and general-reasoning benchmarks show that the proposed approach improves task acquisition over OPSD while preserving general capabilities, resulting in a more favorable empirical plasticity-stability trade-off. These findings identify context quality as a central bottleneck in on-policy self-distillation and demonstrate the value of separating rollout-conditioned guidance from canonical supervision.
Meilin Yang, Zixuan Ding, Jianhao Nie et al.· 0 citations
Distributed large language model (LLM) systems increasingly rely on collective communication primitives such as AllReduce (AR), ReduceScatter (RS), AllGather (AG), and AlltoAll (A2A). In modern LLM training and serving clusters, heterogeneous GPU interconnects, multi-NIC networking, mixed parallelism strategies, low-latency inference requests, and high-throughput training pipelines have motivated increasingly diverse ways to plan, execute, and overlap collective communication. This paper presents a tutorial-style, collective-centric taxonomy for collective communication. We organize recent advances into three layers: communication planning, which generates topology-aware collective schedules; communication execution and adaptation, which maps these schedules onto GPU runtimes and hardware in real clusters; and computation-communication coordination, which turns collective optimization into end-to-end training and inference benefits. We further discuss open challenges and future opportunities for collective communication in distributed LLM systems.
Xuebin Song, Menghao Zhang, Yue Liu et al.· 0 citations