Skip to content

Author

Deeksha Sarvi

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Classifying CRISPR-Cas9 Off-Target Cleavage Sites from GUIDE-seq Data: A Class-Imbalanced Machine Learning Benchmark

Off-target cleavage is a central safety concern for CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, particularly in therapeutic applications where unintended double-strand breaks carry clinical risk. We benchmarked five machine learning classifiers — logistic regression on mismatch-count summary features, a random forest and a gradient boosting model on one-hot-encoded sgRNA/candidate-site sequence pairs, a one-dimensional convolutional neural network (CNN) over the positional mismatch map, and a gradient-boosting/CNN ensemble — on a real, published GUIDE-seq off-target dataset (Kleinstiver et al., 2016, Nature) comprising 95,829 candidate off-target sites for five sgRNAs, of which only 54 (0.06%) were experimentally validated as true cleavage sites. On a held-out, stratified test split (n = 19,166; 11 true positives), gradient boosting on combined mismatch and sequence features performed best (ROC-AUC = 0.997, PR-AUC = 0.355, best F1 = 0.50), outperforming a random forest on raw sequence encoding alone (PR-AUC = 0.083) and a sequence CNN (PR-AUC = 0.129). Because the positive class is extremely rare, we report precision-recall AUC as the primary metric rather than ROC-AUC, which is inflated by the large negative class. A positional mismatch analysis showed that experimentally validated off-target sites carried substantially fewer mismatches overall than non-cleaved candidate sites (mean 3.6 vs. 5.9 mismatches across the 23-nucleotide target), and were markedly more mismatch-intolerant in the 10-nucleotide PAM-proximal seed region (11.3% vs. 27.4% per-position mismatch rate) and at the PAM itself (6.8% vs. 16.0%), consistent with established seed-region and PAM-sensitivity models of Cas9 target recognition. We report these findings, including the low absolute precision achievable in this severely imbalanced, small-positive-class setting, as a realistic picture of what off-target classifiers can and cannot yet deliver from sequence alone.

Deeksha Sarvi, Juhitha Alasyam · 0 citations