Understanding a composite system through its constituents is a fundamental practice in physics. In the context of quantum reference frames (QRFs), however, combining the usual quantum-theoretic notion of composition with QRF perspectives gives rise to subtle issues, such as the'paradox of the third particle'. Here we study in depth how to compose subsystems in QRF perspectives, building on a recent formalism for QRFs [E.Castro-Ruiz and O.Oreshkov, 2025]. We first show how the frames of external observers can be internalised and treated within the framework. This establishes a consistent hierarchy of QRF perspectives, which we use to define the adding and removing of subsystems. We then explain how, owing to the so-called'extra-particle'degrees of freedom, the formalism gives a consistent treatment of subsystems, avoiding any paradoxes by construction. Consistency then implies that composing subsystems in a QRF perspective differs from, and generalises, the standard quantum-theoretic case. In particular, not every state can be appended in tensor-product form relative to a QRF, and we characterise the set of compatible states. Finally, we introduce'classicalisation', a procedure that recovers a classical-like perspective from a general QRF. This procedure circumvents the aforementioned state restrictions but carries a different operational meaning, which we study through a concrete example.
We give an operational resolution of the third-particle paradox, relevant in the theory of quantum reference frames. The apparent paradox is that a system which is irrelevant in one quantum-reference-frame description can seem to become relevant after changing to another quantum reference frame, because the reduced state obtained after transforming a larger system need not agree with the state obtained by first discarding the extra system and then transforming. We argue that this comparison is not operationally meaningful unless the observables are transformed together with the states, or equivalently, unless the subsystem that needs to be discarded is properly identified. If the third particle is irrelevant for all measurements actually available in the original frame, then the transformed measurements form a restricted algebra in the new frame for which the third particle remains irrelevant. The paradox therefore results from replacing an operational statement about probabilities by a stronger, representation-dependent statement about equality of reduced density operators. We close by relating the question of when degrees of freedom may be discarded to the observable-induced, operational approach to subsystem structure.
Č. Brukner, Esteban Castro-Ruiz, Marius Krumm· 1 citation
Quantum theory challenges the view that individual measurement outcomes are predefined and independent of the measurement context. Yet the quantum state itself -- the catalogue of probabilities for all possible measurements -- is usually assumed to be well defined. We argue that this assumption tacitly relies on measurements being performed relative to ideal, infinitely-resourceful reference frames. We show that, when measurements are made relative to non-ideal quantum reference frames, the probabilities themselves become indefinite: even in the limit of arbitrarily large number of runs, the relative frequencies may remain uncertain. The uncertainty is irreducible in a quantum-mechanical sense, as we show by proving a Bell-type theorem for relative frequencies. We further propose a quantum-optical implementation of these relational measurements based on pulsed homodyne detection. Our findings motivate an extension of the notion of the quantum state to regimes constrained by finite resources. We expect them to be especially relevant at the interface between quantum theory and general relativity, where the resources and information available in a bounded region of spacetime are fundamentally limited.
Esteban Castro-Ruiz, Nathan Cohen, L. Barbado et al.· 0 citations