Among the more than 90 identified genetic risk loci for late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) and related dementias, the apolipoprotein E (APOE) gene ɛ2/ɛ3/ɛ4 polymorphisms remain the longstanding benchmark for genetic disease risk with a consistently large effect across studies1-10. Despite this massive signal, the exact mechanisms by which ɛ4 increases and ɛ2 decreases dementia risk remain poorly understood. Notably, recent trials of anti-amyloid therapies suggest less efficacy and higher risks of severe side effects in ε4 carriers11-13, hampering the treatment of those with the highest unmet need. To improve our understanding of the genetic architecture of AD in the context of its main genetic driver, we performed genome-wide association studies (GWASs) stratified by ε4 and ε2 carrier status. HP1BP3, SLC50A1, PTPRC, NPAS3, DDHD1, CHST9, SMYD2, PRAMEF1 and GFRA1 emerged as new genomic signals for AD risk, appearing only when stratified by APOE carrier status. DDHD1 appeared especially promising, showing protective effects in ε4 carriers, being identified as an expression quantitative trait locus and being involved in rare neuronal diseases. Such APOE-stratified insights may help understand and overcome side effects, inform clinical trial enrollment strategies, and create the scientific basis for targeted, mechanism-driven therapies in neurodegenerative diseases.
J. Thomassen, H. Leonard, Brittany Ulms et al.· Nature Genetics· 0 citations
BACKGROUND Genetic frontotemporal dementia (FTD) shows large differences in symptom profiles, brain atrophy patterns, and progression rate, making clinical trials difficult to design and power. There is a need for biomarkers that can model disease progression, identify biologically distinct groups, and support efficient trial enrichment. METHODS We applied contrastive trajectory inference (cTI), a machine-learning method, to structural MRI, white matter hyperintensity, and demographic data from 736 participants in the GENFI cohort, including non-carriers and carriers of C9orf72, GRN, or MAPT mutations. cTI produced an individual “genetic FTD progression score” (0–1) and grouped mutation carriers into data-driven subtypes. We tested construct validity using correlations between progression score and cognitive/functional measures, examined subtype differences in brain–behavior coupling, plasma neurofilament light (NfL), and longitudinal decline, and compared cTI-based trial enrichment against age, cortical thickness and NfL using analytic and simulation-based power analyses. RESULTS Genetic FTD progression scores correlated strongly with global dementia severity and multiple cognitive domains (all p < 0.001), confirming robust clinical scoring. Two mutation-carrier subtypes emerged: a Progressive Track (Subtype 2) with strong associations between progression score and cognitive/functional impairment, rising NfL, and faster longitudinal decline; and a Dissociated Track (Subtype 3) with comparable levels of structural variation but weak or absent clinical and NfL changes, suggesting relative biological stability. Baseline subtype membership added prognostic value for future decline in processing speed and language beyond baseline severity. Notably, for C9orf72 and GRN, cTI-informed enrichment reduced required recruited sample size per arm by about 61–75% compared with unenriched designs, and outperformed enrichment using age, cortical thickness or NfL in both analytic and simulation-based power analyses. CONCLUSIONS Machine-learning stratification of genetic FTD reveals a progressive and a dissociated disease track and provides individualized progression scores that closely track clinical status. cTI progression scores offer a powerful tool for trial enrichment, enabling smaller, more efficient prevention and early-intervention trials than conventional MRI or NfL markers alone.
M. Soltaninejad, Y. Iturria-medina, A. Bouzigues et al.· bioRxiv· 0 citations
Sex and educational attainment significantly affect the development and maintenance of cognitive reserve in individuals with genetic FTD, and underscore the importance of identifying disease-modifying interventions since the presymptomatic stages of the disease.
E. Premi, Damiano Archetti, A. Redolfi et al.· Brain Communications· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
