Skip to content

Author

F. Sembiring

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access Sep 2026

Repositioning digital maturity for higher education and human resource management: evidence from a systematic review and bibliometric mapping

Digital maturity is increasingly recognized as an important condition for organizational transformation; however, it is still frequently assessed primarily through technological readiness, digital infrastructure, and process digitalization. This perspective provides limited guidance for higher education institutions, where digital transformation depends substantially on workforce capability, leadership readiness, organizational learning, and adaptive culture. This study examines the evolution and dimensional structure of digital maturity research and repositions digital maturity as a strategic human resource management capability for higher education. A hybrid systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis was conducted using 333 peer-reviewed journal articles indexed in Scopus and published between 2018 and November 2025. The analysis maps publication trends, thematic evolution, geographic and sectoral patterns, and the dimensional structure of 18 digital maturity models. The findings show that digital maturity research has expanded rapidly and evolved from a predominantly technology-centred orientation towards a broader capability-based perspective. Technology and Strategy are the most consistently represented dimensions, while People and Organization/Culture are essential for translating digital investments into institutional capability. Sustainability, Security, and Integration remain comparatively underrepresented. Based on the literature synthesis, the study proposes an HRM-oriented conceptual framework linking digital maturity dimensions with competency development, strategic workforce planning, digital leadership, organizational learning, and participatory change management. The framework is intended as an analytically grounded conceptual guide rather than an empirically validated causal model. The study contributes to HRM scholarship by clarifying how universities can integrate digital maturity assessment with people-centred capability development and institutional transformation.

Herman Herman, Juliana Juliana, Asep Miftahuddin et al. · 0 citations
Review Open access Sep 2026

Corporate university in two registers: human capital strategy and critique of the academy- a systematic literature review (2010–2026)

Corporate universities have become a recurrent reference point in debates about how organizations build human capital, yet the term carries two largely disconnected meanings: a firm-operated learning-and-development (L&D) institution and a critical shorthand for the corporatized, managerialist transformation of higher education. This ambiguity fragments the evidence base on which human resource management (HRM) and human resource development (HRD) scholars rely. This review asks how scholarly output on corporate universities evolved from 2010 to 2026, what conceptual meanings coexist in the literature, and what themes, theories, and methods characterize each. Following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, a single Scopus search (June 8, 2026) identified 69 journal articles, of which 59 met the eligibility criteria and were synthesized. Bibliometric mapping in Biblioshiny and VOSviewer complemented the thematic synthesis. The corpus grew at an average annual rate of 9.05%, was highly dispersed across 62 sources with no dominant outlet, and was citationally skewed (mean, 13.3; median, 4 citations). Two strands emerged: Strand A frames the corporate university as an instrument of strategic human capital development (n = 22), whereas Strand B treats it as an object of critique within higher education (n = 37). These two strands rarely cite each other and rest on different theoretical foundations. By naming and mapping this conceptual split, the review clarifies which evidence is usable for HRM/HRD theory building and argues that the L&D strand, though smaller and less cited, is where the field's most actionable contributions are concentrated. Keywords: corporate learning; corporate academy; learning organization; talent development; bibliometric analysis; PRISMA

F. Sembiring, J. Sojanah, Juliana et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.