Vision-language models (VLMs) can estimate physical quantities such as duration, speed, and acceleration from visual observations, but existing benchmarks primarily assess overall model performance against annotated ground truth. In deployment, a key question is whether an individual prediction can be trusted when its ground truth is unavailable. Self-consistency alone may fail to capture important failure modes: a VLM may produce stable-but-wrong estimates or rely on textual priors rather than visual evidence. We formulate answer-level selective prediction for quantitative physical reasoning and propose Answer-Level Trust Selection (ATS), a post-hoc, model-agnostic framework for accepting or rejecting individual VLM predictions. ATS requires no fine-tuning, auxiliary verifier, or access to the model's internal logits. Instead, it aggregates eight interpretable behavioral diagnostic scores derived from repeated queries and controlled interventions into a unified trust score. We evaluate ATS in depth on Qwen2.5-VL-7B and across 20 VLM backbones, examining selective performance, diagnostic behavior, and targeted failure modes. Our results show that intervention-based diagnostics help identify stable-but-wrong and prior-tracking predictions that repeated agreement alone may miss. However, improved failure-case rejection can come at the cost of lower retention of correct predictions. ATS therefore complements model-level capability evaluation with answer-level reliability assessment for quantitative VLM predictions. Code will be released upon publication.
Vision-language-action (VLA) models have become the dominant paradigm for language-conditioned robot manipulation. However, although images and language instructions inherently encode geometric information, VLAs acquire their spatial competence purely from demonstrations. As a result, they are reliable only within the range of scene poses that the demonstrations cover. We propose SAVLA, an end-to-end symmetry-aware VLA model for robust and data-efficient policy learning. Our approach keeps the pretrained vision-language backbone entirely frozen while combining it with an equivariant flow-matching action head and a learned canonicalizer. The head decomposes its state, action, and conditioning inputs into invariant and equivariant channels, and preserves this typing throughout all of its layers. The canonicalizer transforms oblique-view images into a canonical frame and rotates the geometric conditions consistently. We evaluate our model on LIBERO. Compared with the GR00T N1.5 baseline, SAVLA improves the success rate averaged over all four LIBERO suites by 5.1 points and increases the mean success rate under rotation on LIBERO-Goal from 41.5% to 90.4%.
It is argued that, even when an LLM has been well aligned in (post-)training, it may still fail to maximise the aligned value in reasoning, and the utility discrepancy between a model's deployed reasoning strategy and its rational counterpart whose responses maximise utility in the steepest direction is formalised.
Comprehensive empirical evaluations demonstrate PEAR significantly improves average accuracy over the strongest debate baselines, and theoretically characterize PEAR as an equivariant sparse router: it preserves accuracy under agent relabeling while reducing routing complexity and improving generalization.
Yang Feng, Ziwei Xu, Xia Hu et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
