Let $\Sigma=(G,\sigma)$ be a connected signed graph of order $n$ and size $m$, and let $s^{+}(\Sigma)$ and $s^{-}(\Sigma)$ denote the sums of the squares of its positive and negative adjacency eigenvalues, respectively. The square-energy conjecture of Elphick, Farber, Goldberg, and Wocjan states that every connected graph $G$ of order $n$ satisfies \[ \min\{s^{+}(G),s^{-}(G)\}\ge n-1. \] Liu and Ning~\cite{LiuNing2023} published a wide-ranging paper entitled ``Unsolved Problems in spectral graph theory", and this conjectures were placed first in their list of such problems. We prove that every signature $\sigma$ of a connected graph $G$ satisfies the sharp bound \[ s^{+}(\Sigma)\le 2m-n+1. \] For the all-positive signing this gives $s^{+}(G)\le 2m-n+1$, whereas for the all-negative signing it gives $s^{-}(G)\le 2m-n+1$. Since $s^{+}(G)+s^{-}(G)=2m$, these two special cases imply the square-energy conjecture; the present theorem is stronger in scope because the same bound holds for every signing of $G$. Applying the theorem to the negation $-\Sigma$ also yields \[ s^{+}(\Sigma)\ge n-1. \] Both bounds are sharp. The proof is based on a doubly nonnegative matrix inequality. We also shorten the proof of that inequality by replacing its final case distinction with a fixed convex combination.
For a graph $G$, let $s^+(G)$ and $s^-(G)$ denote the sums of the squares of its positive and negative adjacency eigenvalues. We determine all equality cases in the conjecture of Elphick, Farber, Goldberg, and Wocjan that every connected graph $G$ on $n$ vertices satisfies \[ \min \{s^+(G),s^-(G)\}\ge n-1. \] Namely, equality for $s^+$ holds exactly for trees, whereas equality for $s^-$ holds exactly for trees and complete graphs. The proof combines the $P_3$-removal lemma in the no-cut-vertex case with a detailed equality analysis of the underlying doubly nonnegative matrix inequality. Every block is forced to be complete, and a minimal-counterexample argument gives an exact rank-one decomposition of the folded matrix $M^c$. The resulting non-edge vanishings, together with $AX=XA$, rule out an interface between a bridge and a nontrivial block.
Fu-Tao Hu, Ya-Yang Liu, Yi Wang· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.