Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity, mortality, impaired quality of life and healthcare expenditure worldwide. The global burden of HF continues to increase due to population aging, improved survival, and the growing prevalence of cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic comorbidities. Simultaneously, the pace of scientific progress in HF has accelerated considerably. Recent advances have refined our understanding of HF epidemiology, prognosis, and disease trajectories, including emerging concepts of HF improvement, remission, and recovery. The Second Universal Definition of HF has also updated the classification framework, moving beyond the traditional ejection fraction-based categories. HF is now broadly classified into two major phenotypes: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Novel mechanistic insights highlight the role of inflammation, immune activation, metabolic dysfunction, mitochondrial biology, and multisystem interactions in HF progression. There has also been significant progress in the characterization and management of major comorbidities, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, obesity, atrial fibrillation (AF), pulmonary hypertension, frailty, malnutrition, and cancer. Diagnostic innovations include novel biomarkers, multi-omics technologies, artificial intelligence-based approaches, advanced imaging techniques, congestion assessment tools, and emerging digital health solutions. Important advances have occurred in specific HF aetiologies, including cardiomyopathies, cardiac amyloidosis (CA), myocarditis, arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AiCM), and Chagas cardiomyopathy. Therapeutic developments continue to reshape HF management across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. Recent evidence has focused on optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy in HFrEF, expansion of evidence-based therapies in HFpEF, and growing roles for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, finerenone, incretin-based therapies, and transcatheter valve interventions. Collectively, these advances support the transition from a predominantly phenotype-based approach towards a more personalized and biologically informed model of HF care, with the potential to further improve outcomes across the entire HF spectrum.
Valentino Liguori, Angelica Rizzello, M. Adamo et al.· ESC Heart Failure· 0 citations
BACKGROUND
The Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) is a validated weighted measure of comorbidity burden, but has an unclear role in heart failure (HF).
OBJECTIVES
To characterize age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) in HF, its association with the use of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) and with outcomes.
METHODS
In the Swedish HF registry, patients were divided into 3 groups based on ACCI scores (low 1-3, intermediate 4-6, and high ≥7). We studied its association with clinical characteristics and GDMT use. Multivariable multinominal and Cox regressions were used to analyze ACCI and its association with ejection fraction (EF) category (reduced [HFrEF], mildly reduced [HFmrEF], preserved [HFpEF]), and with outcomes up to 3 years.
RESULTS
Among 117,419 patients (age 75 [66-82], 36% women, 53% HFrEF, 24% HFmrEF, 23% HFpEF, median ACCI was 5, 6 and 6 respectively. ACCI ≥7 was present in 31% with HFrEF, 35% with HFmrEF and 42% with HFpEF. A higher ACCI score was associated with higher EF category, NYHA class, serum NT-proBNP, diuretic use, and lower quality of life and GDMT use (p<0.05 for all). The risk of composite CV mortality/first HF hospitalization was higher with intermediate (adjusted HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.29-1.39) and high vs low ACCI (1.76, 1.69-1.83). High ACCI category (vs low) was significantly associated with non-CV (adjusted HR 6.36, 95% CI 5.75-7.04), but also, CV mortality (4.35, 3.99-4.74), and total hospitalizations (adjusted IRR 2.16, 2.11-2.22) but also HF hospitalizations 1.23 (1.17-1.28).
CONCLUSION
The ACCI discriminates well in HF, with higher ACCI being associated with greater severity of HF, lesser GDMT use and worse quality of life. Higher ACCI was more strongly associated with death than hospitalization. Higher ACCI was more strongly associated with non-CV outcomes but also with CV and HF outcomes.
Naba Farooqui, L. Benson, T. Thorvaldsen et al.· ESC Heart Failure· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.