Heterogeneous density functional theory (DFT) calculations, particularly plane-wave implementations, introduce systematic formation energy errors ranging from tens to hundreds of meV/atom, depending on the selection of exchange-correlation functionals, kinetic energy cutoffs, pseudopotentials, and dispersion corrections. As demonstrated by the MatPES dataset, identical structures can exhibit an average energy discrepancy of 107 meV/atom between PBE and r2SCAN calculations. Such method-dependent discrepancies hinder the integration of multi-source DFT data, greatly limiting the scale and quality of datasets for training robust materials AI models. Here, we resolve this fundamental data silo barrier via graph-based transfer learning. Leveraging 380,190 structurally paired PBE-r2SCAN entries from the MatPES database, we train a structure-aware graph neural network to predict cross-functional energy residuals and align inconsistent DFT energy scales. By adopting GPTFF model architecture, the model converts conventional PBE energies to r2SCAN-level accuracy with a mean absolute error of 14.3 meV/atom, compared with 18.2 meV/atom achieved by CHGNet. This versatile approach effectively upgrades massive legacy PBE datasets to high-precision r2SCAN standards. It enables reliable predictions of phase stability, battery voltage profiles, and reaction thermodynamics, while allowing the integration of multi-source DFT data to advance the development of high-performance materials foundation models.
Yidong Huang, Tenglong Lu, Hanwen Kang et al.· 0 citations
Most MLIP benchmarks reward static accuracy while ignoring inference efficiency and hardware scalability -- driving model bloat with unclear real-world value. We benchmark 23 mainstream open-source MLIPs on a low-cost NVIDIA DGX Spark (128 GB native memory, capped at 80 GB to mimic ordinary lab hardware), using a fixed 192-atom system under a unified ASE-based pipeline. We evaluate three dimensions: predictive accuracy, MD simulation throughput, and atomic scalability. Our results expose a sharp accuracy-efficiency trade-off: large SOTA models deliver only 3-5 meV/atom more accuracy than lightweight ones, but lose orders of magnitude in throughput -- in the worst case, becoming only marginally faster than DFT itself. Lightweight MLIPs, by contrast, sit on the Pareto frontier and run on modest hardware. The lesson is that single-dimensional benchmarks mislead the field, and that future MLIP development should value efficiency and scalability alongside accuracy.
Hanwen Kang, Tenglong Lu, Sheng Meng et al.· 0 citations