Skip to content

Author

Haoran Wang

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Body roundness index and its association with QUS-defined osteoporosis and bone mineral density in middle-aged and older adults: a cross-sectional analysis

Objectives This study evaluated the association between Body Roundness Index (BRI) and QUS-defined osteoporosis, its discriminative ability, empirical cutoff, and subgroup heterogeneity in middle-aged and older adults. Methods We analyzed cross-sectional data from 1,444 community-dwelling adults aged 35–75 years. Osteoporosis was defined using tibial quantitative ultrasound-derived T-scores. Receiver operating characteristic curves assessed discrimination, restricted cubic splines examined dose-response relationships, logistic and robust regression analyses quantified associations, and subgroup analyses evaluated effect modification. Results The Youden index identified an optimal BRI cutoff of 4.5. High BRI (≥ 4.5) was associated with higher odds of osteoporosis in the unadjusted model (OR = 1.606, 95% CI: 1.292–1.996; P < 0.001), the age- and sex-adjusted model (OR = 1.432, 95% CI: 1.141–1.797; P = 0.002), and the fully adjusted model excluding BMI (OR = 1.404, 95% CI: 1.105–1.783; P = 0.005). The association was approximately linear (P for non-linearity = 0.539; P-overall < 0.001). BRI alone showed modest discrimination (AUC = 0.562, 95% CI: 0.529–0.594), which increased after adjustment for age and sex (AUC = 0.680, 95% CI: 0.652–0.710) and after full covariate adjustment (AUC = 0.695, 95% CI: 0.674–0.731). The association was stronger among participants with metabolic syndrome (OR = 2.62, 95% CI: 1.641–4.179) than among those without it (OR = 1.39, 95% CI: 1.040–1.860; P for interaction = 0.022). Conclusions Higher BRI was associated with QUS-defined osteoporosis, but BRI alone showed limited discrimination, and the fully adjusted model remained only moderately discriminative. BRI should therefore be considered an adjunctive anthropometric indicator within a broader assessment framework, rather than a stand-alone predictor or screening tool. Clinical trial registration https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=187762, identifier ChiCTR2300071492.

Yu-Cong Yang, Qichao Wang, Xiuwei Hou et al. · 0 citations