Importance
Proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibition is recommended as second- or third-line lipid-lowering therapy after myocardial infarction (MI), resulting in prolonged periods of inadequate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) control. Whether in-catheterization laboratory decision of PCSK9 inhibition, started before mechanical reperfusion, could improve LDL-C control and clinical outcomes at 1 year is unknown.
Objective
To evaluate evolocumab as first-line therapy vs standard care in patients with high-risk acute MI undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Design, Setting, and Participants
This international, phase 4, prospective randomized, open, blinded end-point adjudication study was conducted at 48 sites in 6 countries. Adults with high-risk ST-elevation MI (STEMI; aged >55 years) or non-ST-elevation MI (NSTEMI) with 1 or more additional high-risk characteristics were enrolled beginning September 29, 2021, through May 22, 2025, with final follow-up on May 22, 2026.
Interventions
Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive evolocumab 140 mg subcutaneously every 2 weeks for 1 year (first injection before PCI) in addition to standard care (n = 1087) or standard care alone (n = 1074). Standard care included high-intensity oral lipid-lowering therapy with the optional PCSK9 inhibitor use per guideline indication in the control group.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The primary outcome was LDL-C less than 55 mg/dL and at least 50% reduction in LDL-C from baseline at 12 months. The main clinical end point was all-cause death or unplanned cardiovascular hospitalization at 12 months.
Results
Among 2161 randomized patients (mean age, 67 years; 1703 males [79%]; 1261 [58%] with STEMI; 900 [42%] with NSTEMI), the primary outcome was achieved in 792 of 970 patients (82%) with evolocumab vs 370 of 934 (40%) with standard care (adjusted odds ratio, 5.54 [95% CI, 4.50-6.82]; P < .001). At 6 weeks, median LDL-C was 16 mg/dL with evolocumab vs 56 mg/dL with standard care. The main clinical end point occurred in 159 of 1087 patients (14.6%) with evolocumab vs 165 of 1074 (15.4%) with standard care (adjusted odds ratio, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.73-1.19]; P = .59).
Conclusions and Relevance
In patients with acute MI undergoing PCI, first-line evolocumab combined with high-intensity lipid-lowering therapy produced rapid and sustained LDL-C reduction, with more than 80% of patients reaching the guideline-recommended target at 1 year. However, no clinical benefit was detected during the first year of follow-up, arguing against clinically meaningful acute pleiotropic effects of PCSK9 inhibitors in addition to standard care.
Trial Registration
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04951856.
G. Montalescot, E. Ferrari, G. Souteyrand et al.· Journal of the American Medi...· 1 citation
BACKGROUND AND AIM
Randomized trials conducted in the early 2000s established the survival benefit of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after myocardial infarction. However, management of myocardial infarction and heart failure has substantially evolved since that time. We investigated whether the estimated association between primary prevention ICD implantation in post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced LVEF and mortality reduction has changed over time.
METHODS
We analyzed individual participant data from 32,214 patients with LVEF ≤35% after myocardial infarction included in the PROFID pooled cohort, comprising 7,477 patients carrying a primary prevention ICD (ICD patients) and 24,737 patients without an ICD (non-ICD patients). The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Propensity scores were estimated using multivariable logistic regression including age, sex, LVEF, renal function, and diabetes, and overlap weighting was applied to balance treatment groups. Time period-specific analyses were performed across three prespecified time periods defined by inclusion year: 1995-2004, 2005-2014, and 2015-2020. Weighted cumulative mortality curves were generated for each time period. Temporal changes in the estimated association between ICD implantation and mortality reduction were assessed using a weighted Cox proportional hazards model.
RESULTS
A total of 12,097 deaths occurred during a mean follow-up of 43.7 months. The estimated association between ICD implantation and mortality changed significantly across time (P for interaction <0.001). In weighted time period-specific analyses, the estimated mortality reduction associated with ICD implantation progressively decreased over more recent periods. The hazard ratio for ICD versus non-ICD patients was 0.54 (95% CI 0.47-0.62; P<0.001) in 1995-2004, 0.67 (95% CI 0.62-0.72; P<0.001) in 2005-2014, and 0.89 (95% CI 0.73-1.07; P=0.221) in 2015-2020, with negligible separation of the weighted cumulative mortality curves in the most recent time period.
CONCLUSIONS
In this analysis including a large cohort of post-myocardial infarction patients with reduced LVEF, the estimated mortality reduction associated with primary prevention ICD implantation progressively decreased over time.
A. Sepehri Shamloo, T. Chiba, J. G. Tijssen et al.· European Heart Journal· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.