The spread of health misinformation through social media platforms has
transformed into a serious sociomedical threat in undermining public trust on
medicine, health professional’s scientific institutions and public health
authorities. This manuscript looks into how health-related false or misleading
narratives spread on Facebook, Twitter/X, TikTok, YouTube, WhatsApp, and
other similar platforms, especially during public health emergencies like the
COVID-19 outbreak. Health misinformation has the potential to change one’s
risk perceptions, lessening acceptance of vaccination, promoting unsafe
treatments, delaying appropriate care-seeking, and reducing adherence to
evidence-based recommendations. According to the review, cognitive
mechanism refers to the propagation of rumors as misinformation spreaders
are often incapable of disarming popular claims with evident truth. This paper
also describes specific monitoring approaches, including social listening, text
mining and natural language processing, coding frameworks, and citizenscience validation. It will require coordinated action by healthcare
professionals, public health institutions, governments, researchers, media
organizations and social media platforms. Strategies include open
communication about risks, rapid correction of false claims, promotion of
credible sources, digital health literacy, ethical content moderation, platform
accountability, and community-based engagement. To maintain public
confidence in medicine, it is essential to not only correct misinformation but
also enhance the credibility, accessibility and responsiveness of health
communication systems.
I. Alnaimi, Ibrahim Abdul Jaleel Yamani, A. Alkhatib· European Journal of Prosthod...· 0 citations
Artificial intelligence (AI) could transform health care, particularly in lowresource settings (1). The technology enables new capabilities, ranging from
data acquisition to decision support, that amplify ongoing investments in
digital technology to improve access to information, diagnostics, treatment,
and decision-making (2). As health gaps persist between and within countries,
a key question emerges: will deployable AI solutions widen or narrow existing
disparities? (3). In many countries, poverty, education, geography, and race
constitute risk factors that contribute both to health status and to access to
health services and other determinants of health (4).
Two competing hypotheses exist (5). The optimistic view holds that AI can
reduce these gaps by improving the accuracy of diagnostics and therapeutics
and by expanding access to services that would otherwise be out of reach
demonstrates that these capabilities can profitably influence health status and
survival in under-resourced settings where access to trained human capital,
diagnostic devices, and therapeutics is limited (6). The gloomy view maintains
that significant mechanisms exacerbate the very gaps that AI might alleviate:
1) the data on which AI training relies often reflects a chronic lack of
representation, 2) the post-deployment conditions under which models operate
may drift further from those on which models were trained, 3) the
infrastructure and knowledge necessary to deploy new capabilities may be
absent in the most vulnerable settings, and 4) oversights in governance and use could further endanger already vulnerable groups as the market for AI grows (7, 8).
I. Alnaimi, Ibrahim Abdul Jaleel Yamani, A. Alkhatib· European Journal of Prosthod...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.