In steel structures, most of the joints are typically subjected to shear (V) and/or bending (M) forces only, and their behaviour can be fully characterised using the component method as recommended in EN 1993‐1‐8. However, in some situations, these joints may also be exposed to axial (N) forces. Under such a loading co...
Loïc Archambeau, Tudor Golea, K. Weynand et al.· ce/papers· 0 citations
Component‐based spring models developed according to the Component Method provide a practical alternative to advanced finite element (FE) models for predicting the behaviour of beam‐to‐column joints. However, inherent limitations of the EC3 analytical approach lead to joint characterisations that neglect key response f...
Tudor Golea, Romain Bodson, V. de Ville de Goyet et al.· ce/papers· 0 citations
The mechanical response of bolted T‐stub components plays a key role in the nonlinear performance of steel joints. While existing analytical formulations provide accurate predictions for bending‐controlled collapse mechanisms, configurations connected to rigid supports and subjected to large displacements may exhibit a...
A. Francavilla, M. Latour, J. Demonceau et al.· ce/papers· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.