Skip to content

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Genomic insights into stroke recovery: cross-phenotype associations

Abstract Stroke is a major cause of long-term disability with variable recovery. While clinical factors such as initial severity play a role, genetic factors are increasingly recognized as important contributors to stroke recovery. Genotype studies are generally focused on a single post-stroke behavioural domain, but some genes might relate to broad mechanisms of plasticity. This study therefore aimed to identify cross-phenotypic genetic variants associated across two or more stroke recovery domains. DNA from Stroke, Stress, Rehabilitation, and Genetics study participants was genotyped, resulting in 9 814 610 variants. In order to examine cross-phenotypic results, we first conducted genome-wide association studies on the six recovery domains: motor (grip force), cognition (Telephone Montreal Cognitive Assessment), depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-8), stress (Primary Care Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Screen), functional status (Stroke Impact Scale-Activities of Daily Living), and disability (modified Rankin Scale 0–2 versus 3–6), some of which were tested longitudinally, yielding nine phenotypes. Models were adjusted for age, sex, initial severity (NIH Stroke Scale score), and ancestry. Cross-phenotype associations were identified by evaluating single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated (P < 5e-5) with multiple phenotypes. To determine how these genetic variants may relate to biological mechanisms of recovery, we conducted gene enrichment analyses. Participants (n = 565, 59% male) had mild-moderate initial stroke severity (median acute NIH Stroke Scale score = 4). After accounting for the correlation structure among the nine phenotypes, we observed 319 cross-phenotypic SNPs, 3.45 times the expected number. Five of the cross-phenotypic SNPs were linked to genes relevant to neural development, function and plasticity, e.g. ERICH1 (rs11778883-C), FOX3 (rs55726768-G), LIFR-AS1 (rs76401391-T), RPS6KA2 (rs113518460-C) and TUBGCP2 (rs147150392-C), as were enrichments in RAB5–EEA1, CTNNA1–CTNNB1, CIN85–SH3GL2 and ELMO1–DOCK2 complexes. Multiple gene enrichments were found, e.g. Stroke Impact Scale-Activities of Daily Living and Patient Health Questionnaire 8 at 3 months were enriched for CREB phosphorylation, which is important for long-term potentiation. We identified cross-phenotypic SNPs associated with multiple behavioural domains of stroke recovery. Some of these genes encode, or regulate, druggable proteins. These genetic factors are not well captured by clinical or neuroimaging assessments and so provide a unique window into stroke recovery. These findings, if validated, suggest that some genes may be broadly important to stroke recovery.

Chad M. Aldridge, R. Braun, L. Parodi et al. · 0 citations
Aug 2026

Biological Age Associates with Longitudinal Frailty-Related Functional Decline: The Health and Retirement Study.

Epigenetic clocks have emerged as markers of biological aging. Understanding their association with age-related functional decline may provide insights into DNA-mediated mechanisms underlying frailty-related functional decline and reveal which clocks best associate with accelerated functional decline. We therefore examined associations between established epigenetic clock measures and longitudinal trajectories of cognitive function, grip strength, and walking speed. We analyzed data from 4,018 participants in the Health and Retirement Study with available DNA methylation data and up to 12 years of follow-up data. Using linear mixed-effects models, we examined retrospective associations between twelve epigenetic clocks and longitudinal trajectories of frailty-related functional decline, modeling interactions between each epigenetic clock and time, adjusting for chronological age and sociodemographic covariates. In longitudinal analyses controlling for chronological age, older epigenetic age was associated with faster cognitive decline for Hannum (β = -0.0054, 95% CI: -0.0095, -0.0014, p = 0.009) and DNAmGrimAge (β = -0.0141, 95% CI: -0.0174, -0.0107, p < 0.001). Higher DNAmGrimAge was associated with accelerated decline in grip strength (β = -0.024, 95% CI: -0.033, -0.015, p < 0.001) and decline in walking speed (β = -0.0008, 95% CI: -0.0013, -0.0004, p < 0.001). Higher epigenetic clock biological age estimates, particularly DNAmGrimAge, are retrospectively associated with accelerated frailty-related functional decline across multiple functional domains. Systematic comparison of clock derivations may reveal specific epigenetic patterns underlying age-related functional deterioration.

Savvina Prapiadou, Tamara N. Kimball, B. Tan et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.