As the quantum computing field transitions toward Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computing (FTQC), intensive efforts are focused on scaling architectures and realizing active error correction. However, this shift introduces security surfaces that remain largely unexplored. Fault-tolerant quantum computers pair a quantum processor with a classical decoder that sits on the critical path of every syndrome-extraction round. For the first time, this work demonstrates that the wall-clock time each decoder takes to process a syndrome measurement and decoding round constitutes a novel, exploitable hardware side channel on physical quantum hardware. Using per-shot decoder timings from three IBM Heron processors collected over a 68-day window, the decode-time distribution alone allows a passive observer to (i) reconstruct the shot-by-shot detector-firing distribution and estimate the workload's logical error rate $p_L$, (ii) infer the code distance in use, and (iii) fingerprint the specific physical device with up to 89% accuracy (a random guess is 33%), with a pooled two-sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test confirming the decode-time distributions are statistically distinct. In noisy simulation inspired by public data from Google's 105-qubit Willow processor, decoder timing further distinguishes 9 surface-code patches at different locations on the chip with 81% accuracy, showing the side channel persists on below-threshold fault-tolerant hardware from a different vendor and code family.
Friedrich Doku, Jakub Szefer, Kaitlin N. Smith· 0 citations
Cloud-accessible quantum computing has made hardware comparison not only a physics benchmark but also a practical purchasing decision. Cost-aware comparison of quantum computers remains underexplored and is difficult to do under the heterogeneous billing models offered by various cloud-based quantum computing providers. This paper makes two main contributions to enable price-aware comparison of quantum computers. First, this work presents a cross-provider measurement study of quantum circuit execution fidelity spanning 14 cloud QPU access-path entries (12 distinct physical QPUs) across four cloud access paths: Amazon Web Services (AWS) cloud, IBM Quantum Runtime (IBM) cloud, IQM Resonance (IQM) cloud, and Oxford Quantum Circuits (OQC) cloud. Second, this work proposes and analyzes a cost-aware score, Quantum Fidelity-per-Cost (QFC), which combines Kullback--Leibler (KL) divergence from an ideal output distribution, shot count, and monetary cost into one possible metric under a documented billing model. The main empirical observation from this work is that cost-aware ranking can differ from purely fidelity-based evaluation of quantum computers, and that users may select different quantum computing backends when they consider price in their selection, as opposed to selection based on fidelity alone. This work shows that the ranking is stable under reweighting of the metric, and that a device's billing model, not its hardware, governs how its score scales with shot count. Reported QFC values change as new machines come online or as providers revise their prices.
S. Shinde, Jakub Szefer· arXiv.org· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
