The rapid adoption of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) has created a practical problem for virtual higher education: universities must distinguish legitimate AI-supported learning from undisclosed delegation of academic work, while maintaining valid, fair, and privacy-sensitive assessment. This study compared student and faculty perceptions of AI use and academic integrity at the Technical University of Machala, Ecuador. A descriptive-comparative cross-sectional survey was administered to 1660 students and 34 faculty members during the second academic semester of 2024. The student questionnaire examined AI-use frequency, perceived academic benefit, readiness for non-assisted assessment, observation of dishonest online practices, perceived efficacy of virtual assessment, and attitudes toward proctoring. The faculty questionnaire examined suspected AI-generated submissions, responses to suspected use, perceived assessment efficacy, training, control tools, ethical judgments and proctoring. Findings indicate a transitional integrity landscape: students view AI mainly as a useful academic support, whereas faculty interpret it primarily through authorship, evidence and assessment-security concerns. Both groups report limitations in current virtual assessment, suggesting the need for AI-resilient assessment design, explicit disclosure rules, faculty development, student AI literacy, and proportional use of proctoring. The article argues against both blanket prohibition and permissive ambiguity, proposing a governance model grounded in transparent policy, authentic assessment, due process and human-centered AI literacy.
Héctor Carvajal, Fernanda Tusa, Rosemary Samaniego et al.· Trends in Higher Education· 0 citations
Digital transformation in higher education requires integrated designs connecting strategy, governance, infrastructure, interoperability, applications, cybersecurity, accessibility, analytics, and continuous improvement. This study analyzes the Integrated University Digital Transformation Model implemented at Universidad Técnica de Machala, Ecuador, between 2023 and April 2026. A qualitative embedded case study with a design-science orientation examined institutional documents, technical records, governance evidence, cloud migration reports, interoperability mechanisms, system descriptions, analytics outputs, and cloud security assessment records through thematic analysis, process tracing, and artifact evaluation. Findings showed alignment between the Strategic Information Technology Plan and institutional planning; formal IT governance and information security structures; an API- and microservices-based architecture; a staged migration of 52 institutional servers in four operational lots, with documented post-migration monitoring indicating 99.85% average server uptime and no critical incidents attributable to the migration during the monitored period; an automated and traceable admission allocation process within a broader portfolio of integrated academic–administrative systems; and dashboards supporting evidence-informed decisions. MMGSI-Cloud complemented the architecture by assessing governance capabilities, identifying improvement priorities, and linking findings to an institutional roadmap. The case indicates that university digital transformation is strengthened when technological implementation is integrated with formal governance, systematic assessment, evidence-based planning, and institutional accountability.
Jennifer Célleri-Pacheco, Fernanda Tusa Jumbo, Oswaldo Chuquirima Camacho et al.· Future Internet· 0 citations