Skip to content

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Aug 2026

Development and Validation of a Triple-classification Multimodal Model Based on Intratumoral and Peritumoral Radiomics for GGN Invasiveness Assessment.

OBJECTIVE To develop a multimodal model for predicting ground-glass nodule (GGNs) invasiveness, enabling accurate differentiation of pre-invasive lesions (PIL), minimally invasive adenocarcinoma (MIA), and invasive adenocarcinoma (IA). METHODS The retrospective study included pathologically confirmed GGNs between May 2018 and May 2025. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to screen for independent predictive factors. Semi-automated segmentation of intratumoral region (ITR) and two peritumoral regions (PTRs) scaling strategies were used. Radiomics features from ITR and PTRs were selected via Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO), and random forest (RF), support vector machine (SVM), and logistic regression (LR) models were constructed. Four progressive integration models were further created: Conventional, Conventional + follow-up, Conventional + follow-up + ITR, and Conventional + follow-up + ITR + PTR. RESULTS 517 GGNs were included in the training and internal test cohorts, and 91 GGNs from the external test cohort. Maximum diameter, follow-up composite parameter, vacuole, and air bronchus sign were identified as independent predictive factors. Both PTR construction strategies yielded optimal models (PTR3/ PTR6 for fixed-size, PTR50%/ PTR75% for diameter-ratio). The RF exhibited the highest stability. As feature dimensions expanded from conventional features to follow-up information, ITR, and PTR, the AUC exhibited a progressive increase. The full multimodal model with highest AUCs of 0.849 (training cohort), 0.795 (internal test cohort), and 0.838 (external test cohort). CONCLUSION The proposed multimodal predictive triple-classification model, integrating conventional, follow-up, ITR, and PTR, may act as a non-invasive tool for preoperative evaluation of GGNs invasiveness. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE The study first investigated PTR model via the tumor diameter - ratio method and compare it with the fixed-size method. A follow-up composite parameter (Follow-up duration × Follow-up changes status) was used to quantified GGN dynamic changes. The novel multimodal model, integrating conventional, follow-up, ITR, and PTR radiomics features, outperformed single-modal approaches in differentiating PIL, MIA, and IA.

Y. Lv, Jing Ye, Juan Chen · 0 citations
Jul 2026

RadiolGAN: Multicenter Feasibility Study of Synthetic CT From 3D Ultra-Short Echo Time MRI for Enhanced Pulmonary Radiologic Sign Visualization.

BACKGROUND Chest CT requires breath-holding and ionizing radiation. 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE) MRI allows radiation-free imaging, but the image quality is suboptimal. PURPOSE To develop RadiolGAN and evaluate synthetic CT (sCT) from 3D UTE MRI for enhanced pulmonary visualization. STUDY TYPE Prospective multicenter study. POPULATION Three hundred and fifty-nine subjects (167 women, 192 men; 52 ± 19 years) from four centers: 244 training, 61 internal test, and 54 external test. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3 T, 3D UTE gradient-echo sequence. ASSESSMENT Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), noise, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), mean structural similarity index (MS-SSIM), universal quality index (UQI), and learned perceptual image patch similarity (LPIPS). Three radiologists rated pulmonary structures (bronchi, vessels, fissures, artifacts, diagnostic confidence) and radiologic signs (nodules/masses, ground-glass opacities, patchy shadows/consolidation, emphysema/bullae, bronchiectasis) on a 5-point Likert scale. STATISTICAL TESTING Repeated-measures ANOVA, paired t-tests, and Friedman tests; p < 0.05 significant. RESULTS In the external test set, RadiolGAN-CT showed higher SNR (32.63 ± 1.21 vs. 26.07 ± 1.53) and CNR (25.36 ± 1.06 vs. 21.64 ± 1.32), and lower noise (15.74 ± 0.85 vs. 19.66 ± 1.01) than 3D UTE. Versus CycleGAN-CT, RadiolGAN-CT achieved higher PSNR (65.32 ± 0.19 vs. 64.68 ± 0.21), MS-SSIM (0.912 ± 0.004 vs. 0.892 ± 0.004), FSIM (0.808 ± 0.007 vs. 0.783 ± 0.006), and UQI (0.854 ± 0.007 vs. 0.843 ± 0.007), and lower LPIPS (0.221 ± 0.010 vs. 0.236 ± 0.009). No differences were found between RadiolGAN-CT and CycleGAN-CT in SNR (p = 0.612), CNR (p = 0.547), or noise (p = 0.595). Diagnostic confidence was higher for RadiolGAN-CT (3.98 ± 1.09) than CycleGAN-CT (3.59 ± 1.06) and 3D UTE (2.84 ± 1.30). Ground-glass opacity depiction did not differ between RadiolGAN-CT and CycleGAN-CT (p = 0.903). DATA CONCLUSION RadiolGAN enables high-fidelity sCT from 3D UTE, improving structural depiction and perceptual similarity. EVIDENCE LEVEL 1. TECHNICAL EFFICACY 2.

Xi Zhu, Wei Xia, X. Xie et al. · 1 citation

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.