In Online Shadow Tomography, we are given copies of an unknown $d$-dimensional quantum state $\rho$, an adversary (adaptively) proposes a sequence of bounded observables $A^{(1)},\ldots,A^{(m)}$, and after each $A^{(t)}$ is given we must estimate $\mathrm{Tr}(A^{(t)}\rho)$ to within $\pm \epsilon$. This is the direct quantum generalization of the classical problem of Adaptive Data Analysis. Prior results for online Shadow Tomography were suboptimal in all three parameters $m, d, \epsilon$, lagging behind the best known and classical rates, for which there is some evidence of optimality. In this work, we finally close this gap, giving a pair of algorithms matching the classical rates. Our first algorithm is the first to achieve $o(\log^2 m)$-dependence together with $\mathrm{poly}(\log(d)/\epsilon)$; moreover, it improves all three exponents even in the Offline Shadow Tomography setting. Our second algorithm is known to be optimal among bounds independent of $d$, and improves the best prior result by a $\sqrt{m} \log m$ factor. The key to our proof is a new framework for quantifying post-measurement damage, based on the quantum Efron-Stein decomposition.
Sitan Chen, R. O'Donnell, Angelos Pelecanos et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation· ⚡1
We give an algorithm which, given $n = O(d^2 \cdot (\log\log(d)/\log(d))^2)$ copies of $\rho$, estimates the eigenvalues of $\rho$ to constant error in total variation distance. Thus, we can learn the eigenvalues of a quantum state with fewer copies than the $\Theta(d^2)$ needed to run full state tomography. This is the first improvement to spectrum estimation over the influential Keyl-Werner algorithm, which uses $n = \Theta(d^2)$ copies, thereby resolving a question raised by Keyl and Werner in 2001 and refuting a 2016 conjecture of Wright. Our main technical tool is a new tomography guarantee, where the error of tomography in a particular direction $|w\rangle$ scales with $\langle w | \rho |w\rangle$ for all directions simultaneously. From this stronger"relative-error"bound, we recover better algorithms for principal component analysis in Bures distance and tomography in $\chi^2$-divergence as corollaries.
Angelos Pelecanos, Jack Spilecki, Ewin Tang et al.· arXiv.org· 5 citations· ⚡5
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.