Bipolar disorder’s (BD) clinical heterogeneity has an unresolved genetic basis. We meta-analyzed genome-wide association studies (GWAS) of 16 BD subphenotypes in 226,032 individuals from 57 cohorts (38,022 cases); 10 advanced to multivariate and multi-trait analyses. Four factors (compulsive, psychotic, dysregulated, internalizing) explained 82.8% of shared genetic variance. BD1 and BD2 loaded on distinct factors despite a high genetic correlation; 87.0% of common-factor loci were significant in neither subtype. Unipolar mania aligned with psychosis over internalizing, and was distinguishable from BD1, and rapid cycling showed heritable cross-domain liability. We identified 356 risk loci, 158 novel, including the first univariate-GWAS associations for psychosis, unipolar mania, rapid cycling and schizoaffective disorder—and 249 credible genes (89 high-confidence), 12 with approved-drug or clinical-phase annotations. Cell-type association showed a midbrain dopaminergic–GABAergic gradient along the psychotic factor. BD’s genetic architecture appears hierarchical—a general liability resolving into dimensions of course and comorbidity, beyond subtypes.
Tracey van der Veen, M. Tesfaye, J. M. K. Yang et al.· Research Square· 0 citations
Introduction Limitations of current classifications of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, and bipolar disorder are evident from their overlapping symptoms, aetiologies, treatments, and outcomes, and present a barrier to novel treatment discovery. Alternative conceptualisations are needed to address nosological validity, align diagnosis to aetiology, and improve prognostication and treatment choice. We aimed to identify latent classes across the psychosis spectrum based on premorbid functioning and outcomes, and assess these in relation to genetic liability and symptom dimensions. Method Participants with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or bipolar disorder type 1, were ascertained from four UK clinical cohorts (total n=5,043). Latent class analysis was conducted using phenotypes not included within the diagnostic criteria, including premorbid functioning, age at illness onset, and measures of severity and course. Polygenic scores (PGS) for psychiatric disorders and behavioural traits were tested for associations with latent classes. We tested if diagnosis explained associations between PGS and classes. Results A three-class model provided the best fit. Class one had poorer premorbid functioning, lower rates of recovery, and higher PGS for schizophrenia and ADHD. Class three had the highest functioning, higher rates of psychosocial stressors before onset, higher intelligence PGS and lower PGS for psychiatric disorders. Class two was intermediate between classes one and three on measures of functioning, but was characterised by high levels of involuntary hospital admissions and high bipolar disorder PGS. Diagnosis only partially explained associations between PGS and class membership. Conclusions We identified classes across the psychosis spectrum characterised by different premorbid functioning and outcomes, that cut across diagnostic categories and captured genetic liability not explained by diagnosis. Our findings suggest alternative conceptualisations of psychotic disorders may complement diagnoses in mapping to the aetiology of these conditions, and could be useful to advance precision psychiatry.
Charlotte A. Dennison, S. Legge, A. Cardno et al.· medRxiv· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
