Skip to content

Author

Kwang-Seong Shin

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Confidence-Calibrated Consistency Matching for Semi-Supervised Image Classification Under Extreme Label Scarcity

Labeling images is expensive, but unlabeled data is abundant. Semi-supervised learning (SSL) addresses this gap, though the dominant pseudo-labeling methods can suffer from confirmation bias—reinforcing their own confident-but-wrong predictions—most severely when labels are scarcest. Under a controlled, reproducible compute-constrained protocol on CIFAR-10, SVHN, and CIFAR-100, we examine which ingredients of consistency-based SSL actually help when as few as four labels per class are available. We propose CCM (Confidence-Calibrated Consistency Matching)—a per-class curriculum threshold, a dual strong-view consistency loss, and a smooth confidence weighting that softly admits borderline pseudo-labels—together with a unified view in which FixMatch, FlexMatch, SoftMatch, and CCM instantiate a single generalized weighting function. On CIFAR-10 with 40 labels, CCM reaches 35.14%, a significant improvement over the FlexMatch design it directly extends (+3.30 percentage points (pp), paired t-test p = 0.001). SoftMatch, re-trained under the identical budget, performs better still at the two smallest budgets (37.04% at 40 labels, p = 0.049), while CCM leads numerically at 4000 labels: the two smooth-weighting designs top the extreme-scarcity board—convergent evidence that the smoothness of the weighting function, more than the placement of its threshold, is the decisive design axis. We also report a negative result: cross-view agreement helps neither as an admission gate nor as reliability reweighting, reducing accuracy by up to 4.37 pp; agreement is a positive correctness signal, but its absolute level (approximately 44% correct among agreeing pseudo-labels) is too low to filter on safely. Curriculum thresholding, by contrast, hurts on the easier SVHN dataset and fails outright on CIFAR-100 when its per-class statistics become too thin. CCM adds no inference-time cost. We do not claim universality; we characterize when each ingredient helps within a single, identical-budget protocol.

Dong-Hyun Won, Hyuk-Gyu Park, Kwang-Seong Shin · 0 citations