Agentic AI systems act through multi-step trajectories that combine planning, tool use, memory, interaction, and adaptation. This behavior stretches validation practice beyond component testing and one-shot input--output evaluation, because acceptable system behavior now depends on how decisions unfold over time and under changing environmental conditions. This survey synthesizes 257 papers spanning agent evaluation, software assurance, cyber-physical systems, runtime monitoring, and regulatory guidance in order to characterize the validation problem for agentic systems. The review is organized around a five-dimension taxonomy covering behavioral, safety, temporal, regulatory, and multi-agent concerns, and uses that taxonomy to map current approaches and expose recurrent coverage gaps. The analysis shows that behavioral evaluation is comparatively mature, while temporal validity, runtime evidence maintenance, regulatory legibility, and open-ended multi-agent systems assurance remain under-developed. Three cross-domain case studies (medical care, industrial operations, smart-mobility systems) provide operational illustrations of how the five taxonomy dimensions recur in safety-critical settings, grounded in the failure patterns documented in the reviewed literature. The paper concludes with a lifecycle-oriented research agenda centered on bounded-autonomy specifications, adversarial trajectory generation, runtime monitoring, and audit-ready evidence structures. The central claim is that trustworthy deployment of agentic AI depends on validating trajectories in context rather than assessing isolated components alone.
Fabio Orazio Mirto, L. D’Agati, Giuseppe Tricomi et al.· 0 citations
Cloud Continuum applications require experimental environments capable of combining heterogeneous Edge, Fog, Cloud, and high-performance computing resources while preserving reproducibility, observability, and control over distributed deployments. This paper presents a two-level reference architecture for Cloud Continuum experimentation built on top of the SLICES Cloud Continuum Blueprint. The proposed approach separates the research-infrastructure layer, which exposes and manages distributed resources, from the application layer, where Cyber-Physical workflows are organized according to an Edge-Fog-Cloud pattern in which placement, timing, and data provenance are treated as first-class experimental concerns. The architecture is designed to support multiple continuum applications rather than a single domain-specific prototype. At the Edge, applications interact with physical devices and perform low-latency sensing or safety actions; at the Fog, they execute near-source coordination, mediation, and stream-processing logic; at the Cloud, they consolidate global knowledge through analytics, optimization, and visualization. This partitioning enables researchers to deploy, customize, and compare alternative control and monitoring strategies over the same programmable infrastructure substrate. The approach is validated through two representative use cases: Renewable Energy Community management, where distributed Digital Twin coordination and time-window-based energy control are requested, and AirWatch, a monitoring pipeline focused on anomaly detection, low-latency alerting, and cloud-side aggregation. Both workloads are evaluated through a systematic campaign of 40 runs comparing virtualized and physical edge deployments over a geographically distributed infrastructure.
Fabio Orazio Mirto, Giuseppe Tricomi, L. D’Agati et al.· 0 citations