Skip to content

Author

Manas Kumar Yogi

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access 2026

Safe Intelligence for All: Building Adversarially Resilient LLM Interfaces for CTI

The democratization of Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) through Large Language Models (LLMs) represents a paradigm shift in organizational security posture, enabling non-expert users to access and interpret complex threat data through intuitive natural language interfaces. However, this democratization introduces a critical paradox: the very mechanisms that lower the barrier to CTI consumption simultaneously expand the attack surface for adversarial manipulation. This paper presents a comprehensive investigation into the dual challenge of CTI democratization and adversarial resilience, proposing a novel Multi-Layer Adversarial Defense Framework (MLADF) and the CTI-SHIELD (Systematic Hardening and Intelligence-Enhanced LLM Defense) algorithm. Our threat model—formalized through the STRIDE methodology—identifies four primary adversarial attack classes: prompt injection, data poisoning, output manipulation, and model extraction, and systematically analyses their exploitation pathways in CTI deployment contexts. We introduce the Adversarial Resistance Score (ARS), a composite metric for evaluating the robustness of CTI LLM interfaces, and a Confidence-Aware Response Sanitization (CARS) technique combining Monte Carlo dropout uncertainty quantification with knowledgebase factgrounding. Experimental evaluation through structured red-team exercises demonstrates that MLADF reduces adversarial attack success rates by an average of 87.3% compared to unprotected baselines while maintaining 91.4% user comprehension accuracy and achieving calibration error (ECE) of 0.028—superior to all competing methods. A human-in-the-loop user study (n=48) confirms that our protected interface reduces adversarial susceptibility by 76.0% (p<0.001) without degrading usability. Ablation studies confirm all four MLADF layers are individually necessary, and cross-domain generalization experiments across five security verticals confirm AUC > 0.90 outside the CTI training domain.

Manas Kumar Yogi, K. C. Bheri · 0 citations