We prove that the set of bounded ratios $\BR(X)$ on a semialgebraic set $X\subset\R^n_{>0}$ is the convex cone of linear forms that are nonnegative on the tropicalization $\trop(X)$. In particular, it is a rational polyhedral convex cone. For $X$ the set of Lorentzian polynomials with fixed M-convex support, it is the dual to the set of M-convex functions. We record an explicit counterexample to a conjecture of Huang--Huh--Soskin--Wang on the bounded ratios on Lorentzian polynomials. The bounded ratio in the counterexample corresponds to the non-hypermetric clique-web facet $\mathrm{CW}^1_7(1,1,1,1,1,-1,-1)$ of the cut cone on seven vertices.
Br\"and\'en and Huh showed that Lorentzian polynomials unify Hodge-Riemann relations in combinatorics: their supports are M-convex, and every M-convex set supports a Lorentzian polynomial. Baker, Huh, Kummer, and Lorscheid later proved that, for every $q>0$, the projectivized space $\mathbf{P}\operatorname{L}_J$ of Lorentzian polynomials with support $J$ is homeomorphic to the thin Schubert cell $\operatorname{Gr}^{\mathrm{w}}_J(\mathbb{T}_q)$ of weak representations of $J$ over the generalized triangular hyperfield $\mathbb{T}_q$. We study the quantitative relation between Lorentzian polynomials and representations over triangular hyperfields. For every matroid $M$, we prove that some $q>0$ depending on $M$ satisfies $\operatorname{Gr}^{\mathrm{w}}_M(\mathbb{T}_q)\subseteq\mathbf{P}\operatorname{L}_M\subseteq\operatorname{Gr}^{\mathrm{w}}_M(\mathbb{T}_2)$. Thus $\mathbf{P}\operatorname{L}_M$ lies between two thin Schubert cells, each homeomorphic to it. More generally, for every M-convex set $J$, some $q>0$ depending on $J$ satisfies $\operatorname{N}\operatorname{Gr}^{\mathrm{w}}_J(\mathbb{T}_q)\subseteq\mathbf{P}\operatorname{L}_J\subseteq\operatorname{N}\operatorname{Gr}^{\mathrm{w}}_J(\mathbb{T}_2)$, where $\operatorname{N}$ denotes normalization. We also study $q(M):=\sup\{q>0:\operatorname{Gr}^{\mathrm{w}}_M(\mathbb{T}_q)\subseteq\mathbf{P}\operatorname{L}_M\}$. For $q(n):=q(U_{2,n})$, we prove $q(4)=2$ and $q(5)=\log_2 3$, with matching upper and lower bounds of order $1/n$; hence $q(n)=\Theta(1/n)$, so in particular no universal positive lower bound for $q(n)$ exists.
Matthew Baker, June Huh, Mario Kummer et al.· 2 citations· ⚡2
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
