Learning humanoid-object interaction requires coordinating whole-body balance, locomotion, and dexterous hand contact to control both robot and object motion. Human demonstrations provide examples of coordinated interaction, but transferring these behaviors to humanoid robots requires learning how to establish and maintain effective contacts under different embodiments and dynamics. We present Weave, a unified framework for learning whole-body dexterous humanoid-object interaction from captured human demonstrations. Weave first converts captured human-object interactions into executable robot-object references through contact-aware retargeting and approach-motion completion. At its core is a contact- and geometry-aware policy that jointly commands 29 body joints and 12 actuated finger joints across multiple objects and interaction sequences. Evaluation across nine objects yields a 92.5% success rate on trained interactions and, without any additional training, 65.0% on sequences never seen during training. We additionally release ~9,000 physically executed rollouts spanning ~23 hours, providing robot-object trajectories with contact annotations for downstream interaction-policy learning and physically consistent HOI motion generation. Project website: https://xiaohu-art.github.io/Weave/
Liu Cao, Xing-Ze Wu, Jing-Zhi Cui et al.· 0 citations
Embodied artificial intelligence (AI) must be tested in the clinical environments where it will operate, but building realistic, robot-testable settings is costly and difficult to scale. Here we show that routine clinic images can be transformed into operational digital twins for task-based evaluation of embodied AI. Using 39 ophthalmic clinic scenes, we converted single photographs into editable, simulator-ready environments and assessed reconstruction quality, room-scale geometry, mesh grounding, multi-robot feasibility, perturbation sensitivity and closed-loop policy performance. The reconstructed scenes preserved workspace structure, while local editing enabled controlled device reconfiguration. Device meshes, collision proxies and semantic anchors converted visual reconstructions into contact-aware simulation scenes. Across three robot embodiments, shared task targets showed different patterns of reachability and contact feasibility. Small device translations and rotations produced task-specific changes in contact margins that were not captured by visual similarity alone. Digital-twin trajectories also supported local policy learning and closed-loop evaluation. These findings establish operational validity as a key principle for clinical digital twins and provide an intermediate layer between offline development and physical deployment of embodied AI in healthcare.
Xinyuan Wu, Jingrao Zhang, Meng-Di Xu et al.· 0 citations
Evaluating robot manipulation policies is becoming increasingly important as generalist models, particularly vision-language-action (VLA) models, are deployed on physical robots. However, conventional real-world evaluation remains labor-intensive, unstable, and insufficiently informative. It requires repeated hardware trials, manual scene resets, and continuous operator monitoring, may produce different policy rankings across repeated evaluations, and primarily relies on success-rate metrics that provide limited information about execution quality. In contrast, humans assess robot performance by observing and comparing complete behaviors rather than relying solely on binary success outcomes. To this end, we propose R2S-Eval, an evaluation pipeline that combines real-to-sim calibration with vision-language model (VLM) preference evaluation. The real-to-sim component efficiently generates rollout videos in a simulator calibrated to the real-world evaluation setting, thereby reducing the need for repeated hardware trials. The VLM evaluator assesses the execution quality of rollout videos and produces pairwise preferences, which are subsequently aggregated into policy rankings. We further introduce a protocol to assess whether the proposed evaluation pipeline yields validated policy conclusions while mitigating the key challenges of conventional real-world evaluation. Experiments in both simulation and real-world settings demonstrate that R2S-Eval produces reliable and stable policy conclusions, achieves agreement with human preferences, substantially reduces repeated hardware-operation effort, and reveals behavior-quality differences that are not captured by binary success labels. In general, R2S-Eval advances robot evaluation from manual success counting toward automated, statistically stable, and quality-aware evaluation of robot behavior. Project page: https://r2s-eval.github.io.
Yi-Di Wang, Fei-Xiang Ruan, Ruo-Qu Chen et al.· 1 citation
Robotic systems are entering clinical care, but full autonomy remains constrained by patient variability, safety requirements, dynamic clinical environments, and the need for professional oversight. Human–robot collaboration (HRC) offers a more realistic path: clinicians retain judgment and responsibility, while robots and AI support sensing, planning, action, and decision‐making within defined task boundaries. In this narrative review, we examine recent advances in clinical HRC from a systems perspective, covering system architecture, learning and control, safety mechanisms, autonomy assessment, and real‐world deployment. We propose a dual‐brain framework, comprising a professional brain for clinical reasoning and decision support, and a physical brain for embodied sensing, planning, and task execution. Using examples from imaging, rehabilitation, surgery, and outpatient care, we argue that clinical autonomy is developing in stages from clinician‐supervised imaging and decision support to bounded robotic subtasks and workflow‐level coordination, instead of through unsupervised replacement of healthcare professionals. We further discuss how robustness, trust, accountability, and human factors shape safe adoption in practice. By framing autonomy as collaborative rather than substitutive, this review provides a unifying foundation for designing and evaluating the next generation of autonomous clinical systems.
