Inference for infectious disease transmission on dynamic contact networks is complicated by latent infection times, partially observed network evolution, measurement error in contact data, and infection originating from outside the observed population. Existing likelihood-based approaches typically address these challenges separately and often rely on restrictive assumptions such as fully observed networks, closed populations, or symptom onset as a surrogate for infection time. We develop a unified complete-data likelihood framework for epidemic processes evolving on partially observed dynamic networks. The proposed formulation represents disease progression, network evolution, and observation mechanisms as interacting continuous-time stochastic processes within a common probabilistic framework. Specifically, we couple a susceptible-exposed-infectious-removed (SEIR) epidemic process with a status-dependent dynamic contact network and explicit observation models for symptoms and contacts. The resulting framework accommodates latent incubation periods, intermittent network observation, contact measurement error, and external infection pressure while preserving a coherent likelihood structure. Our principal contribution is the derivation of a complete-data event-history likelihood for the joint epidemic-network process under partial observation. The likelihood provides a rigorous foundation for likelihood-based and Bayesian inference through data augmentation, clarifies how information from disease progression and contact dynamics jointly determines parameter estimability, and reveals a broad class of existing epidemic network models as special cases. More generally, the framework contributes to statistical inference for partially observed interacting stochastic systems on evolving networks and establishes a foundation for uncertainty-aware analysis of complex transmission processes.
Inference for epidemic transmission on dynamic networks is fundamentally limited by latent infection times, incomplete contact histories, imperfect observation, and external sources of infection. Although coherent likelihood formulations are available for partially observed epidemic processes, considerably less is known about the theoretical limits of statistical inference under such observation mechanisms. This paper develops a unified framework for studying identifiability and Fisher information in epidemic transmission models observed on dynamic contact networks. We establish conditions for structural and local identifiability, derive observed and complete-data information matrices, and quantify information loss arising from unobserved transmission events and missing network information through a missing-information decomposition. We further investigate how observation frequency, network coverage, and measurement accuracy influence parameter estimability and statistical efficiency, providing a principled basis for evaluating surveillance strategies. Simulation studies demonstrate that the proposed framework accurately characterises the relationship between observation design, statistical information, and parameter estimation, with theoretical predictions closely matching finite-sample performance. The proposed framework clarifies the relationship between observation design, identifiability, and inferential precision, and provides a theoretical foundation for statistical inference in partially observed epidemic transmission models.