Skip to content

1 paper indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access 2026

On the k-Total Domination Number of Circulant, Shadow, and Strong Product Graphs

A set <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$S\subseteq V(G)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> is called a <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-total dominating set of a graph <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$G$ </tex-math></inline-formula> if every vertex of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$G$ </tex-math></inline-formula> lies within distance at most <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula> of some other vertex in <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$S$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k\ge 1$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. The minimum cardinality of such a set is called the <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-total domination number of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$G$ </tex-math></inline-formula>, denoted by <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\gamma _{t,k}(G)$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. In this paper, we investigate <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-total domination from a coverage-based perspective. We establish a new lower bound for <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\gamma _{t,k}(G)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> in terms of the diameter of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$G$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. To analyze neighborhood coverage in <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-total domination, we extend the concepts of shadow and share to <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-neighborhoods and introduce the neighborhood coverage number. We also extend the concept of redundant domination to the setting of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-neighborhoods. Together, these concepts quantify both the coverage provided by <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-neighborhoods and the overlap among them. These concepts yield new insights into the structure of <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-total dominating sets and are applied to obtain results for circulant graphs. We show that the shadow graph operation preserves the <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-total domination number; that is, <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\gamma _{t,k}(D_{2}(G))=\gamma _{t,k}(G)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> for every graph <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$G$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. For strong product graphs, we establish general upper bounds and prove that <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$\gamma _{t,k}(H\boxtimes H')=\gamma _{t,k}(H)$ </tex-math></inline-formula> whenever <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$r(H')\le k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>. As a consequence, we obtain exact values of the <inline-formula> <tex-math notation="LaTeX">$k$ </tex-math></inline-formula>-total domination number for several classes of shadow and strong product graphs, including shadow graphs of paths and cycles, and strong products of paths and cycles.

N. Eswar, R. Jayagopal · 0 citations