Skip to content

Author

N. O. Adelakun

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Review Open access Jul 2026

Multimodal Sensing and Artificial Intelligence–Driven Data Fusion in Wearable Health Technologies, Advances, System Challenges, and Research Frontiers

Multimodal sensing and data fusion using artificial intelligence have transformed wearable health technologies by integrating various physiological signals for continuous health monitoring. This study provides a comprehensive perspective on wearable technologies, such as fusion hierarchies, machine learning interpretation, and deployment in wearable body area networks. The research offers a performance assessment and structural issues affecting reliability, including sensor diversity, dominance, noise, and intermittent data loss due to motion artifacts and dropouts. As a result, it explores multimodal fusion failure modes, demonstrating how asynchronous failure and partial observability can cause instability in multimodal representations. The study also highlights the transition from continuous to event- and window-based processing to improve energy, computational, and clinical efficiency in edge computing. The study explores emerging approaches like self-supervised learning, multimodal foundation models, and digital twin-based personalized health models for enhancing robustness and generalization. The research also considers advances in functional materials, such as mechanochromic materials and biointegrated sensing platforms, to enable intuitive and seamless physiological monitoring. Finally, the work considers the regulatory, energy, and system constraints on these innovations and notes that future wearable systems must combine computational intelligence with physical form factors, interpretability, and safety, with robustness and adaptability being the guiding design principles. Received: 20 March 2026 | Revised: 22 May 2026 | Accepted: 1 July 2026 Conflicts of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest to this work. Data Availability Statement Data sharing is not applicable to this article as no new data were created or analyzed in this study. Author Contribution Statement Najeem Olawale Adelakun: Conceptualization, Methodology, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing, Visualization, Supervision, Project administration. Matthew Babatunde Olajide: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Data curation, Writing – review & editing, Supervision, Project administration. Samuel Adeniyi Omolola: Formal analysis, Investigation, Resources, Data curation, Project administration.

N. O. Adelakun, M. Olajide, S. A. Omolola · 0 citations
Review Open access Aug 2026

Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Engineering: A Review of Ethical Governance, Societal Transformation, and Environmental Sustainability

Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being incorporated into engineering practices, transforming the design, construction, operation, and maintenance of systems. The present study explores recent peer-reviewed literature on three interwoven aspects of this transformation: ethical governance, societal change, and environmental sustainability. The review covers new governance instruments such as the European Union Artificial Intelligence Act, ISO/IEC 42001, and the NIST AI Risk Management Framework, as well as explainable-AI (XAI) methods that engineers are increasingly using to explain to regulators, clients, and the public why their safety-critical decisions are made. Also, it addresses the implications of AI on engineering labor markets, professional education and decision-making power, including the differential exposure of high-skill cognitive tasks to automation, and the need for new skills. Furthermore, it considers the dual nature of AI in terms of its contribution to resource optimization, predictive maintenance and integration of renewable energy, and its contribution to an increasing computational carbon and water footprint that can offset these benefits, a tension that is sometimes referred to as the Jevons paradox. The review suggests an integrated framework of responsible AI engineering that connects the three elements of responsible AI: technical explainability, institutional accountability, and life-cycle environmental auditing. The review concludes that long-term acceptability and acceptance of AI in engineering practice will not only be determined by the performance of the models themselves, but also by the ability of the engineering discipline to govern AI transparently, fairly and within planetary limits.

N. O. Adelakun · 0 citations