Skip to content

Author

Nandish Chattopadhyay

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Preprint Aug 2026

MOAT: Model-Agnostic Randomized Transformations for preventing Efficiency Degradation Attacks on ViTs

To adopt the Vision Transformers (ViTs) in resource-constrained environment, token pruning is widely used to reduce computational cost without impacting accuracy. However, adversaries have developed targeted attacks against said token pruning techniques to undermine such attempts to make ViTs efficient. In this paper, we propose MOAT, a model-agnostic pre-processing defense pipeline that applies a combination of input transformations to protect efficient ViT implementations against adversarial efficiency attacks. MOAT operates directly on the input without requiring modifications to the model architecture or token pruning mechanism. Experimental results demonstrate that, across all evaluated ViT models, MOAT limits GFLOPs degradation under adversarial attacks to within 3.4% of the original unattacked model.

Anadi Goyal, Nandish Chattopadhyay, C. Karfa et al. · 0 citations
Review Aug 2026

A Survey of Adversarial Efficiency Degradation for Vision Transformer by Exploiting Input-adaptive Optimization

Vision Transformers (ViTs) increasingly rely on input-adaptive inference, such as token pruning and early halting, to meet energy and latency budgets. This survey examines a recent class of adversarial efficiency degradation attacks that target these mechanisms to increase computation without necessarily degrading accuracy. We unify and compare two representative attacks, SlowFormer (a universal adversarial patch) and DeSparsify (per-image perturbations), across three popular token-pruning frameworks: A-ViT, ATS, and AdaViT. We standardize reporting using GFLOPs, accuracy loss, and an Attack Success (AS) metric that measures how much of the model's compute savings the attack takes away. Understanding these attacks is crucial for designing countermeasures that not only mitigate risk but also remain lightweight, since deployment often occurs in low-power settings such as mobile or embedded devices. To organize our analysis, we focus on three questions: how input-adaptive optimizations (e.g., token pruning and early halting) create attack surfaces for efficiency degradation; how such attacks operate in practice and which optimizations are most vulnerable; and which defenses exist today and whether they meaningfully restore efficiency under attack.

Anadi Goyal, Nandish Chattopadhyay, Anupam Chattopadhyay et al. · 0 citations