Computer-adaptive tests such as Cambridge Linguaskill adjust item difficulty dynamically to match test-taker proficiency, and their speaking components are now used for high-stakes admission and exit decisions, including in Malaysian higher education. Yet little research has examined the vocabulary load and lexical demands of adaptive speaking assessment, leaving open whether the vocabulary elicited at each reported level is congruent with the Common European Framework of Reference (CEFR) levels the scores claim to represent. This article develops a complete corpus-based methodological framework for identifying, classifying, and profiling the vocabulary of the Linguaskill Speaking Test. The framework specifies the compilation of a specialised corpus of transcribed candidate responses stratified across CEFR levels, supplemented by official test preparation materials, and a three-lens profiling procedure using LexTutor for BNC-COCA word-family analysis, the New General Service List for high-frequency lemma coverage, and Text Inspector for CEFR-aligned profiling against the English Vocabulary Profile. Operational criteria are defined for distinguishing core from peripheral vocabulary at each adaptive level, and decision rules are specified for classifying each level as aligned, over-demanding, or under-demanding relative to CEFR expectations, benchmarked against published lexical coverage thresholds for spoken English. The central hypothesis, motivated by prior coverage research, is that the lexical demands elicited by adaptive speaking tasks will not rise in step with claimed CEFR levels. The framework is grounded in an argument-based approach to validation and articulates the washback, fairness, and pedagogical stakes of the alignment question. The article contributes a replicable protocol for lexical validation of adaptive speaking tests and a benchmark synthesis for interpreting its future results.
Rosatiqah Yahya, Y. Ng, M. V. Govindarajoo et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations
The implementation of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (CEFR) in Malaysia has increased the need to evaluate English language textbooks that support communicative competence. This study evaluated the effectiveness of English Plus 1 Year 5 in developing listening and speaking skills among Malaysian primary ESL learners. A convergent parallel mixed-methods design was employed, combining an evaluation of the ELT-TEC textbook with survey responses from 30 English-language teachers in Malaysian government primary schools. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative responses were analysed through thematic analysis using NVivo 15. The findings indicate that the textbook generally supports oral language development through structured listening and speaking activities. However, teachers identified limitations related to support for lower-proficiency learners, authentic communication, cultural relevance, and classroom implementation. The study recommends enhancing CEFR-aligned instructional materials by incorporating more authentic tasks, differentiated learning zactivities, culturally relevant content, and greater professional support for teachers.
Vidhyalakshmi Gopalakrishnan, Yu Jin Ng, Anealka Aziz et al.· International journal of res...· 0 citations