Skip to content

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Aug 2026

Reverse Imaging: Any-Sequence Generalization for Cardiac MRI Segmentation.

Pretrained segmentation models for cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often fail to generalize across imaging sequences due to substantial contrast variations. These variations arise from different imaging protocols, yet fundamentally, all contrasts are governed by the same underlying tissue properties, primarily captured by three components: the magnetization strength (M0), T1, and T2. Building on this insight, we introduce Reverse Imaging, a physics-driven framework for data augmentation and domain generalization in cardiac MRI. Our method infers tissue properties from observed MR images with annotation by solving an ill-posed nonlinear inverse problem, regularized by a generative prior. The prior is learned from the multiparametric saturation-recovery single shot acquisition (mSASHA) dataset for joint cardiac T1 and T2 mapping. In inference, we characterize imaging sequences as weak, moderate, or strong observations according to the physical information they provide and the degree of ill-posedness. This motivates an iterative prior-learning strategy that uses moderate T1-mapping observations to alleviate mSASHA data scarcity via pseudo tissue-property estimates. We further integrate MRI physics into posterior inference by expressing the sequence model as a likelihood term guiding the reverse diffusion process. For widely used but weak cine observations, we develop a sequence-specific ControlNet to improve efficiency and spatial consistency. Extensive experiments on eight unseen cardiac MRI sequences with markedly different contrast mechanisms show that Reverse Imaging yields plausible tissue-property estimates, supports synthesis of diverse yet physically consistent contrasts, and improves segmentation robustness under severe cross-sequence shifts.

Yidong Zhao, Yi Zhang, Tong Yang et al. · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

Beyond Field Accuracy: Two-Axis Diagnosis of Inverse-PINN Parameter Error

Inverse physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) can reconstruct a field accurately while returning an incorrect physical parameter. We introduce a two-axis post-training diagnosis that separates finite-sample resolution under a specified observation-and-estimation protocol from the signed parameter preference encoded by the final learned field and residual metric. The first axis repeatedly fits noisy observations with a matched forward estimator. At known synthetic truth, the second freezes the field and residual view and computes a local score displacement toward a nearby residual-profile minimum. Endpoint consistency then tests whether joint training delivers that preference under the same final view. Across three synthetic one-dimensional, scalar-parameter PDEs, matched-forward mean absolute relative error ranges from 2.34 percent to 17.46 percent. The displacement tracks frozen-profile minima across locked seeds, architectures, and fresh-noise retraining (r from .945 to .982), and it tracks delivered signed log-error in 240 fresh-noise RBA runs (r = .994; 237/240 correct directions). A coupled two-parameter Darcy check validates the full matrix calculation. The axes are complementary diagnostic coordinates, not additive error components or a deployable oracle-free estimator. Together, they route follow-up work toward observations, residual evidence, or endpoint delivery.

Yifan Zhang, Qian Tao · 0 citations