We introduce a framework for distributed quantum inference under communication constraints. In our model, $m$ distributed nodes each receive one copy of an unknown $d$-dimensional quantum state $\rho$, before communicating via a constrained one-way communication channel with a central node, which aims to infer some property of $\rho$. This framework generalizes the classical distributed inference framework introduced by Acharya, Canonne, and Tyagi [COLT 2019], by allowing quantum resources such as quantum communication and shared entanglement. Within this setting, we focus on the fundamental problem of quantum state certification: Given a complete description of some state $\sigma$, decide whether $\rho=\sigma$ or $\|\rho-\sigma\|_1\geq \epsilon$. Additionally, we focus on the case of limited communication between distributed nodes and the central node: we assume each communication channel is limited to only $n_c$ bits and $n_q$ qubits with $n_c + n_q \leq \log d$. When all nodes can make use of a shared source of randomness, we show that the copy complexity of distributed state certification is $\Theta(\frac{d^2}{2^{n_q} 2^{n_c/2}\epsilon^2})$. We further demonstrate that shared randomness is necessary to achieve the above complexity, by proving an $\Omega(\frac{d^3}{4^{n_q} 2^{n_c} \epsilon^2})$ lower bound in the $\textit{private-coin}$ setting. Moreover, we develop a private-coin algorithm that matches this bound up to a $\sqrt{\log d}$ factor, showing this complexity is near-optimal. Together, our work establishes a general framework for distributed quantum inference with communication constraints and characterizes the complexity of distributed state certification with limited communication.
Kenny Chen, Mina Doosti, R. Sweke et al.· 0 citations
In recent years, the utility of parameterized quantum circuits as function approximators has been widely studied. In the context of reinforcement learning, this approach has led to variational quantum algorithms such as quantum Q-learning. While these methods show promising empirical results, and can provide provable advantages for artificial problems, it remains unclear whether they can provide a provable quantum advantage over classical approaches for problems of practical relevance. A natural way to investigate this question is through the lens of dequantization: The construction of efficient classical algorithms capable of matching the performance of quantum variational methods. Building on recent kernel-based dequantization results for supervised learning, we take steps towards extending this surrogate-based dequantization program to reinforcement learning. Specifically, we study the simplified setting of reinforcement learning with a uniform generative model in which uniformly random state-action samples are available, which models the regime of sampling from a large experience replay buffer after sufficient exploration. Within this setting, we provide finite sample guarantees for classical kernelized Fitted Q-Iteration, with classical kernels designed to match the inductive bias of particular parameterized quantum circuits. Using these results, we then provide a set of sufficient conditions, on the data-encoding strategy of a parameterized quantum circuit, the corresponding classical kernel, and the problem structure, under which kernelized Fitted Q-Iteration provides a meaningful dequantization of quantum Q-learning, in this simplified setting. Apart from providing rigorous dequantization guarantees when these conditions are met, these results also motivate the use of kernelized fitted Q-iteration as a dequantization heuristic when these sufficient conditions cannot be verified.
Pablo Rodriguez-Grasa, Sofiène Jerbi, Mikel Sanz et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
