Skip to content

Author

Raby Guerbaz

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Open access Aug 2026

Reliable auto insurance fraud detection using boosting and deep learning models through comprehensive predictive performance, calibration, statistical significance, and economic impact

Insurance fraud detection poses a key challenge due to substantial class imbalance, heterogeneous claim types, and the continual evolution of fraudulent practices. Despite several Machine Learning (ML) approaches having been developed, comparative assessments that simultaneously address predictive performance, calibration stability, cost-effectiveness, and comprehensive statistical analyses remain scarce. To bridge the gap, this study presents a robust evaluation framework for identifying auto insurance fraud that incorporates boosting-based classifiers, advanced deep tabular architectures, and adaptive resampling methods. Six classification models -namely Categorical Boosting (CatBoost), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), eXtreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Attentive Interpretable Tabular Learning Architecture (TabNet), Feature Tokenizer Transformer (FT-Transformer), and Multi-Layer Perceptron Residual Network (MLP-ResNet)- were tested under three data balancing methods (Original, SMOTE, and ADASYN). Contrary to previous studies that focus exclusively on classification performance, the proposed framework includes sensitivity analysis, probabilistic calibration scoring, effect-size evaluation, expected-cost analysis, Pareto frontier optimization, and statistical significance tests. The comparative evaluation reveals that no single model systematically outperforms all others. CatBoost with ADASYN provides the most balanced predictive performance, while TabNet presents superior probabilistic prediction quality and the lowest expected cost. These findings show that the optimal model depends on the target objective, whether predictive accuracy or cost-sensitive fraud detection, a result further validated by the Friedman and Nemenyi statistical tests. In addition, the Pareto frontier analysis identifies CatBoost and TabNet as supplementary optimal trade-offs between predictive performance and operational cost. Statistical analysis confirms significant differences among the evaluated configurations, attesting to the robustness of the findings. Overall, the proposed framework highlights the complementary strengths of boosting-based approaches and TabNet, offering a reliable and cost-effective method for insurance fraud detection, depending on the targeted operational objective.

Chadia Bekkaye, Tarek Zari, Raby Guerbaz · 0 citations
Open access Aug 2026

From classical to generative AI approaches for univariate and multivariate time series forecasting with an evaluation in finance, energy, and health domains

Time series forecasting plays a central role in finance, energy, and public health. Classical statistical, machine learning, deep learning, and generative approaches have all been applied to forecasting tasks in these fields, but comparisons between them are usually confined to a single domain or to models from the same family, and few studies report both univariate and multivariate results under the same conditions. This paper presents a controlled cross-domain comparison of four representative paradigms: classical statistics (Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with Exogenous variables, SARIMAX), gradient boosting machine learning (Light Gradient Boosting Machine, LightGBM), recurrent deep learning (Recurrent Neural Network, RNN), and generative-adversarial deep learning (Conditional Generative Adversarial Network, CGAN). Each model is evaluated on three monthly datasets with contrasting characteristics: Bitcoin prices (175 observations, high volatility), U.S. energy consumption (612 observations, strong seasonality), and U.S. cardiovascular mortality (300 observations, gradual trend with pandemic shock). Both univariate and multivariate variants are tested under the same preprocessing and one-step-ahead evaluation protocols, using eight performance metrics. The CGAN reaches the lowest MAPE on energy consumption (2.88%). On Bitcoin, the multivariate LightGBM lowers the MAPE from 28.26 to 19.25%, while on cardiovascular mortality the RNN reaches 3.34% MAPE. No paradigm performs best in every domain, and the gain from exogenous variables depends on both the paradigm and the domain.

Mohamed Nachat, Hassan Oukhouya, Said El Melhaoui et al. · 0 citations

We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads. See our Cookie Policy.