A key challenge in practical quantum machine learning (QML), particularly for discriminative tasks such as classification, is the limited capacity of near-term quantum devices to encode high-dimensional classical data into small quantum registers. In optimized basis-encoded (bit-bit) settings, this constraint leads to cross-class collisions, where samples with different labels are mapped to the same discrete bit-string and thus become indistinguishable to any downstream model. In this work, we investigate how data representation affects QML performance under such severe information bottlenecks. We introduce discretization-aware fine-tuning (DAFT), a method that adapts a pre-trained chemical foundation model to produce representations that remain informative after quantization. DAFT reduces collision probability through a differentiable soft collision loss. We evaluate both quantum and classical models under a controlled setting in which they receive identical discretized bit-string inputs, isolating the effect of representation from model architecture. On the blood-brain barrier penetration (BBBP) molecular property prediction benchmark using ChemBERTa-77M, DAFT reduces collision counts by several orders of magnitude and improves quantum classification accuracy by more than 12 percentage points compared to a frozen backbone. Importantly, without DAFT, classical models outperform QML under the same input constraints. With DAFT, however, this comparison reverses at higher qubit counts. At 10 qubits, the quantum model surpasses a matched classical baseline trained on identical bit-strings (0.883 vs. 0.855, $p = 0.026$). These results show that, in information-constrained regimes, achieving a quantum advantage critically depends on aligning continuous representations with discrete quantum encodings.
Machine learning is being increasingly used for the detection, diagnosis, and treatment of cancer. However, models often struggle with biological data due to high dimensionality, limited sample diversity, and complex feature interactions. Recent works have investigated the potential for quantum machine learning models to exhibit improved performance over classical models on this kind of complex data, but have often lacked rigorous empirical evaluation of quantum advantage. In this work, we develop a methodology for fair benchmarking of quantum and classical machine learning models, based on the Red Cedar quantum machine learning and resource estimation framework and AutoML-optimized classical neural networks. We assess the potential for quantum advantage in machine learning across tabular, omics, and spatial oncological datasets drawn from the existing quantum machine learning literature, with a range of preprocessing methods, and find no evidence of quantum advantage. Our results suggest that the field should prioritize analyzing higher-dimensional, more biologically realistic datasets to make meaningful progress toward practical quantum advantage in oncological classification problems.
Sydney Leither, Thomas Lubinski, Michael Kubal et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.