The automotive industry's shift toward software-driven systems has increased system complexity and raised the importance of effective requirement intake and refinement for correctness, compliance, development speed, and systematic reuse. Although prior research has proposed techniques for improving requirement quality, limited empirical evidence exists on how stakeholder-level requirements are evaluated, refined, and transformed into product-level requirements in industrial automotive practice. This paper presents a large-scale empirical study based on an industrial dataset from Infineon, comprising 8,082 stakeholder requirements and 5,870 product requirements enriched with traceability links, decision outcomes, deviation rationales, and domain references. Using a mixed-methods approach, we combine quantitative analyses of requirement structures, decision distributions, and mapping patterns with qualitative analyses of rationales, referenced specifications, and software- and hardware-related artifacts. We investigate structural and contextual differences between stakeholder and product requirements, factors influencing acceptance, rejection, and approval with deviation, and the nature of stakeholder-to-product refinement. The results reveal systematic differences across abstraction levels and show that refinement complexity is driven primarily by architectural scope and missing contextual information rather than linguistic verbosity. We further derive a taxonomy of stakeholder-product mapping patterns and relate these patterns to differing refinement effort. The findings provide concrete insight into industrial requirements intake and refinement practices and identify actionable opportunities for improving intake validation, deviation management, and tool-supported contextual enrichment to support faster and more reusable automotive product development.
Zixu Wang, Shengcheng Yu, Zhenchang Xing et al.· 0 citations
GUI agents have advanced rapidly, producing a growing body of frameworks, benchmarks, and applications. However, this growth has outpaced the maturity of the field. GUI agents remain technically brittle, incompletely engineered, and insufficiently validated for sustained real-world use. They are evolving into closed-loop software systems. Within these systems, model reasoning is coupled with interface perception, execution feedback, recovery, and human oversight. This evolution calls for a software engineering perspective that remains largely absent from existing research. We address this gap by reviewing 336 GUI-agent papers from January 2018 to April 2026. Five research questions examine the research landscape, architectures, evaluation, software lifecycle concerns, and future opportunities. Our findings show that the field has expanded sharply since 2024, while mobile and web settings remain dominant. Architectures increasingly adopt modular perceive-reason-act loops, but recovery, human escalation, safety enforcement, and auditability remain underdeveloped. This architectural imbalance extends to evaluation. Evaluations are becoming more interactive, but they remain centered on task success and are difficult to compare across protocols. More broadly, existing studies provide limited support for testing beyond benchmarks and for maintaining agents after release. Observability, privacy engineering, and systematic human oversight are also underdeveloped. Together, these findings show that capability improvements alone cannot ensure deployment readiness. Future research should connect dependable execution with lifecycle-centered testing and reproducible evaluation. It should also integrate permission and privacy controls with cost-aware, human-centered governance. This integration is necessary to build dependable, maintainable, secure, and deployable GUI-agent systems.
Shengcheng Yu, Yuchen Ling, Junyang Xing et al.· 0 citations