The rapid expansion of real-time Internet of Things (IoT) applications has positioned uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) as a promising solution for flexible and timely data collection in areas lacking robust infrastructure. This paper investigates a UAV-assisted secure status updating system, where a UAV serves as a mobile relay to forward status updating packets from ground devices (GDs) under the threat of a potential eavesdropper. To ensure information freshness and operational sustainability, we formulate a long-term stochastic optimization problem to minimize the cumulative average age-of-information (AoI) of all GDs and energy consumption of the UAV. The formulated optimization problem is an online mixed-integer non-linear programming problem, which involves the joint optimization of the flight speed, direction, and transmission power of the UAV as well as the binary scheduling indicator of GDs. To tackle the inherent non-convexity and complex spatial-temporal coupling, we propose an agentic artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approach, named adaptive truncated quantile critics with large language models (LLM)-enabled state representation and reward function design (ATQC-L). Specifically, an adaptive truncated quantile mechanism is incorporated to mitigate distributional overestimation in dynamic environments. Furthermore, we leverage the reasoning capability of LLMs as an offline design-time agent to generate task-aware state representation and intrinsic reward functions. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed ATQC-L algorithm outperforms representative DRL baselines in balancing information freshness and energy consumption of the UAV, while maintaining stable performance under different network scales, LLM backbones, truncation-parameter settings, imperfect eavesdropping channel state information, and mobile eavesdropping scenarios.
Chuang Zhang, Geng Sun, Jiahui Li et al.· IEEE Transactions on Cogniti...· 0 citations
Agentic tutoring systems increasingly rely on large language models (LLMs) to generate real-time feedback, yet risky outputs, such as answer leakage, contradiction, and hallucination, can directly affect learning. Answer leakage is a central concern in this setting. It exposes problem solutions to students and can be verified through human annotation. This article presents a pedagogical style-conditioned audit protocol for automated evaluators that detect answer leakage in LLM-generated tutoring feedback before deployment. Using 1100 mathematics problems from the MATH dataset and 4400 feedback items generated under Baseline, Direct, Socratic, and Encouragement styles, we compare rule-based, embedding-based, natural language inference-based, and two LLM-as-a-Judge evaluators from different model families (Qwen2.5-32B and Gemma3-27B) and validate them against a 314-item human-annotated gold standard. The results show that pedagogical style changes how answer-leakage signals appear in feedback and how reliably automated evaluators detect them. Rule-based and LLM-Judge evaluators that perform well under Baseline, Direct, and Encouragement show consistent degradation under Socratic feedback. The primary LLM-Judge (Qwen2.5-32B) achieves overall F1 = 0.726 but drops to 0.427 on Socratic items, and a second LLM-Judge (Gemma3-27B) reproduces this degradation with Socratic F1 = 0.342. The four factorial prompt-sensitivity variants reach overall F1 up to 0.844, but their Socratic F1 remains at or below 0.390. These findings show that automated tutoring-feedback auditing must be style-specific, prompt-calibrated, and human-grounded before deployment.
Wenzhuo Song, Xuechen Wang, Shuang Liang et al.· IEEE Transactions on Learnin...· 0 citations