Highlights What are the main findings? Review of four emerging foundation model paradigms for remote sensing image segmentation—Transformer-based architectures, state space models (Mamba), prompt-driven segmentation (SAM), and self-supervised or multimodal pre-training analyzing trade-offs in global context modeling, computational efficiency, and cross-modal representation. Synthesis of downstream adaptation strategies, including parameter-efficient fine-tuning (LoRA, adapters), prompt engineering, few-shot and zero-shot learning, open-vocabulary segmentation, and domain adaptation, revealing how each strategy addresses the gap between pre-training and remote sensing requirements. What are the implications of the main findings? Identification of fundamental bottlenecks limiting current models, including the tension between representation generality and remote sensing-specific adaptation, multimodal sensor heterogeneity, and insufficiencies in existing evaluation ecosystems and annotation paradigms. A forward-looking research roadmap toward remote-sensing-native pre-training, lightweight edge-deployable architectures, and unified open-world geospatial foundation models, providing guidance for future research and practical deployment. Abstract Remote sensing image segmentation is a foundational task in Earth observation. With the rapid growth of remote sensing datasets in terms of scale, modality diversity, semantic openness, and spatio-temporal complexity, the field is evolving from task-specific supervised learning toward foundation-model paradigms. Recent advances in foundation models—including Transformer-based architectures, Mamba-based state space models (SSMs), prompt-driven frameworks such as the Segment Anything Model (SAM), and self-supervised or multimodal pre-training—have profoundly reshaped the technical landscape of remote sensing image segmentation. This paper reviews recent progress from the perspectives of dataset evolution, model architectures, and downstream adaptation strategies, covering parameter-efficient fine-tuning, prompt engineering, few-shot and zero-shot learning, open-vocabulary segmentation, and domain adaptation. We further analyze core challenges including the tension between representation generality and remote sensing-specific adaptation, multimodal sensor heterogeneity, and the insufficiency of existing evaluation ecosystems. Finally, we discuss future directions toward remote-sensing-native pre-training, lightweight edge deployment, and unified open-world geospatial foundation models.
Ming Deng, Yongyi Chen, Guanghai Ding et al.· Italian National Conference...· 0 citations
Multi-object tracking (MOT) plays a fundamental role in visual perception, where accurate trajectory prediction is essential for reliable target association under complex motion patterns. Recent trackers have improved motion modeling with densely activated artificial neural networks, yet they largely overlook whether such dense responses are necessary for trajectory prediction. In this paper, we formulate activation sparsity preference (ASP) by tackling two key questions: 1. How can we identify a model architecture that appropriately and formally explains ASP, and 2. How can we translate this explanation into competitive tracking performance. Theoretical analysis shows that sparse gating is no worse than state-independent dropout under the same activation rate. Based on this insight, SpikingMOT is proposed as a spike-driven tracker that adaptively models sparse trajectory dynamics with spiking neural networks (SNNs). Specifically, SpikingMOT decomposes each trajectory state into pseudo-trajectory bases and uses the current prediction error to calibrate the posterior for next-frame prediction. With this brain-inspired loop, SpikingMOT achieves state-of-the-art performance in extensive experiments, 74.9 HOTA on SportsMOT and 56.5 HOTA on DanceTrack, while reducing the parameters and energy by 72% and 86.7%, respectively. These results bring SNNs into MOT, opening a promising direction for efficient tracking.
Yiding Sun, Xiangyang Yang, Dongxu Zhang et al.· 0 citations