Electronic Health Records (EHRs) are widely used for clinical risk prediction using machine learning. International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes provide structured information about patient diagnoses, but representing them effectively remains challenging. Existing approaches often face a trade-off between predictive performance and interpretability: grouping-based representations are interpretable but may lose information, while embedding-based representations achieve strong predictive performance but are difficult to interpret. We propose Explainable Representation of Multiple ICD Codes (xMICD), a method for constructing low-dimensional patient representations from sets of ICD codes. xMICD combines clinically meaningful diagnostic groupings with similarity in a pre-trained ICD embedding space. Instead of using binary group membership, the method assigns codes to groups via similarity-based relative assignments, yielding features that reflect how closely a patient's diagnoses align with each clinical group. Experiments on large-scale EHR datasets demonstrate that xMICD achieves predictive performance comparable to embedding-based representations such as ICD2Vec across multiple clinical prediction tasks. At the same time, the resulting features remain clinically interpretable because each dimension corresponds to a recognizable diagnostic group. xMICD therefore provides a practical way to integrate embedding-based semantic relationships into interpretable clinical feature spaces for machine learning models.
P. Vatiwutipong, Kumkup Keeratisiwakul, Albert Phuoc Kien Van Truong et al.· 0 citations
Traditional security auditing and compliance are resource-intensive manual processes. Recent work has applied Large Language Models to automate compliance tasks, but these approaches typically rely on textual inputs, limiting their applicability to real-world audit artifacts. This study proposes a Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM)-based system for security requirements verification using evidence-grounded analysis of multimodal audit artifacts. The model is constrained to only consider artifacts provided at inference time. Evaluation is conducted through an industrial case study using real audit data, including artifacts, requirements, and ground truth labels. Results show good accuracy and explainability (up to 77%), high consistency, and high recall but lower precision. These findings demonstrate the potential of MLLMs to support automated security requirements verification in practical audit settings.
Ismail Esack Dawoodjee, A. Khurat, Thanapon Noraset· International Joint Conferen...· 0 citations