Multi-view clustering (MVC) relies on consistency learning to align and fuse multi-view information for building clustering decision boundaries. However, mainstream methods adopt sample-to-sample/distribution/structure similarity smoothing for consistency alignment, which builds upon continuous cluster manifolds with semantic and geometric overlap and reliable paired priors of sample correspondences. They suffer from semantic- and instance-level view-unaligned problems inherent in the real-world data with discrete non-convex structures and unreliable cross-view correspondences. Misled by unaligned noise, they weaken discriminative semantic boundaries via similarity smoothing over false-positive pairs, and degrade discrete non-convex structures by mistakenly bridging distinct cluster manifolds via pseudo-semantic interpolation. Such consistency alignment pursues highly similar representations, distributions and structures, which deviates from the clustering logic of many-to-one partitioning as well as its learning goal for separable semantic boundaries. Guided by the many-to-one principle, we jointly formulate consistency alignment and clustering decision as a novel sample-to-cluster map, termed Multi-view Discrete Optimal Transport. Specifically, MvDOT is instantiated as a cluster-level transport matching framework that first adopts semi-discrete OT to learn a global OT barycenter via aggregating semantic-geometric information from all views, and then transports samples to barycenter-anchored consensus clusters under consistency constraints on semantic assignment and geometric measure. Even with discrete cluster manifolds and unreliable sample correspondences, MvDOT achieves cross-view consistent alignment while preserving inter-cluster semantic boundaries to uncover the underlying cluster structures. Extensive experiments show MvDOT outperforms 10 baselines with higher confidence and stronger robustness in complex MVC tasks.
Yuzhuo Dai, Siwei Wang, Zhibin Dong et al.· IEEE Transactions on Pattern...· 0 citations
Ontology-based Knowledge Graphs (KGs) augment entity representation through additional semantic information, facilitating link prediction for unseen entities through predefined ontology libraries. While most existing knowledge graph representation learning methods predominantly focus on co-optimizing both entities and ontologies to leverage ontological contexts, the structural-semantic discrepancies in ontology-based KGs have been largely overlooked. Through graph structure analysis, we identify two fundamental limitations: (1) structural incompatibility between entity subgraph semantics and multi-ontology mappings (1-N redundancy), and (2) missing explicit ontology link in subgraph contexts (1-0 absence). To resolve these issues, we propose a structural empowered module built upon link prediction backbones. First, we develop a subgraph-aware semantic expansion module that coordinates $k$-hop neighborhood information with LLM-generated descriptions to alleviate structural sparsity. Subsequently, a contrastive ontology matching mechanism resolves structural inconsistencies by computing adaptive similarity metrics between ontology embeddings and subgraph-derived semantic prototypes. Experimental results demonstrate that our model outperforms fourteen state-of-the-art models, maintaining robust performance across varying benchmarks and subgraph density conditions.
Hao Li, K. Liang, Lingyuan Meng et al.· IEEE Transactions on Pattern...· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.