Germline Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) has emerged as a powerful genomic approach for investigating Hereditary Cancer predisposition through the comprehensive analysis of coding regions across the genome. Although multigene panels currently represent the standard diagnostic approach for Hereditary Cancer assessment, a substantial proportion of high-risk individuals and families remain molecularly unexplained. In this setting, germline WES may serve as a valuable second-tier strategy by identifying pathogenic variants in genes not routinely included in conventional testing panels and by addressing part of the unresolved “missing heritability” observed across Hereditary Cancer syndromes. Increasing evidence supports its application in hereditary breast and ovarian cancer, Lynch-like syndrome, colorectal polyposis, hereditary diffuse gastric cancer, and ovarian cancer predisposition, where WES has contributed to the identification of additional susceptibility genes and improved molecular characterization. Beyond Hereditary Cancer diagnostics, exome-based approaches have also been explored for tumour profiling, homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) assessment, biomarker discovery, and therapeutic stratification. However, despite its significant potential, the clinical implementation of WES remains challenging because of the high burden of variants of uncertain significance (VUS), difficulties in variant interpretation, incidental findings, and the need for robust functional validation of candidate genes. This review critically examines the current evidence supporting the clinical utility of germline WES in Hereditary Cancer syndromes, focusing on the clinical scenarios in which WES may provide meaningful additional information beyond multigene panels, its diagnostic yield, limitations, and future perspectives in precision oncology.
Anastasia Dell'Elice, L. Lombardi, Federico Anaclerio et al.· Genes· 0 citations
CES may provide additional exploratory genomic information in selected high-risk BRCA1/2-negative patients, particularly when standard panel testing is uninformative, and represents a valuable resource for future reinterpretation as gene-disease evidence evolves.
Anastasia Dell'Elice, Claudia Palmarini, Federico Anaclerio et al.· Journal of Medical Genetics· 0 citations
RvD5 reduced PD-1 expression on T cells and PD-L1 expression on cancer cells, thereby restoring T cell antitumor functions by delaying their differentiation into Tex, and suppresses tumor growth by dampening inflammation and delaying T cell exhaustion within the TME.
Maria Tredicine, Simona D'Orazio, Nunzia Coletta et al.· Journal of Immunology· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.