The large language models (LLMs) are beginning to provide tangible changes to the practice of network security: better threat detection; tighter enforcement of policy; and faster incident response. This survey provides a practitioner’s perspective on the use of LLMs in each of the key areas of network security, with a focus on 6G-enabled mission-critical communication systems, including public safety networks, emergency response coordination, and resilient infrastructure supporting URLLC, non-terrestrial networks (NTN), and edge deployments; these include traffic analysis, anomaly detection, threat intelligence, intrusion detection, vulnerability management, access control, compliance auditing, and security training. The survey documents specific improvements provided by LLMs with respect to context-aware classification, parsing of logs at a fine level of granularity, translating high-level policies to executable rules, and scripting of realistic threat scenarios to test against. We show how the combination of prompt engineering, multimodal embeddings, federated learning, and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) can be used to expand the capabilities of the Security Operations Center (SOC), and automated defense. We also identify some of the risks associated with the use of LLMs, which include hallucination in output, leakage of sensitive information, and creation of new attack vectors through integration with the model; we also note some of the safeguards that have begun to emerge. We further analyze concrete public safety and emergency response scenarios - including LLM-assisted disaster-zone threat detection and emergency communication prioritization under adversarial overload - examining the specific vulnerabilities introduced by NTN-enabled 6G architectures and the stringent latency requirements of URLLC deployments. In conclusion, we provide working baseline levels of capability with respect to current LLM-based solutions in 6G mission-critical and public safety contexts, and map out specific research directions to advance LLM-driven cybersecurity toward robust, adaptable, explainable, and life-safety-aware solutions.
Siva Sai, Bhuvan Arora, Vineet Suri et al.· IEEE Open Journal of the Com...· 1 citation
Large Language Model (LLM)–based agents are rapidly evolving from passive assistants into autonomous, tool-using, and collaborative systems capable of executing complex, long-horizon tasks across web, software, and physical environments. However, the current literature remains fragmented, with inconsistent terminology, ad hoc architectures, and limited evaluation standards, making it difficult to compare systems or deploy them reliably in real-world settings. This paper presents a unified, taxonomy-driven, and deployment-oriented survey of agentic AI systems, synthesizing recent advances through a modular reference architecture and a four-dimensional taxonomy that characterizes agents along the axes of autonomy, tool use, collaboration, and safety–governance. We systematically analyze representative single-agent, tool-augmented, and multi-agent frameworks within this taxonomy, highlighting design trade-offs, capability scaling patterns, and recurring failure modes. Beyond architectural analysis, we review emerging evaluation methodologies that move beyond static benchmarks to assess agent behavior, robustness, grounding, and operational cost in interactive environments. Importantly, the survey emphasizes practical considerations for enterprise and safety-critical deployment, including access control, human-in-the-loop oversight, and policy enforcement. By unifying conceptual foundations with empirical trends and deployment constraints, this work provides a structured roadmap for researchers and practitioners to design, evaluate, and govern next-generation LLM-based agentic systems.
Sparsh Bajoria, Shreyanshu Ranjan, Adhitya M et al.· Cognitive Computation· 0 citations