Skip to content

Author

Vishesh Jain

2 papers indexed here

We haven’t gathered this author’s papers yet. Follow them and we’ll fetch their work.

Not the right person? Other researchers publish under this name.

Preprint Aug 2026

The Sharp Dimension Bound in the Johnson--Lindenstrauss Lemma

The Johnson--Lindenstrauss lemma asserts that every set of $n$ points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space embeds into $O(\varepsilon^{-2}\log n)$-dimensional Euclidean space with distortion at most $1+\varepsilon$. Larsen and Nelson conjectured that the optimal target dimension throughout the full range of the parameters $n,d, \varepsilon$ is \[ \Theta\left(\min\left\{d,n-1,\frac{\log(2+\varepsilon^2n)}{\varepsilon^2}\right\}\right). \] We resolve this conjecture in the affirmative. In fact, we prove the stronger statement that the upper bound is attained by a linear map. The matching lower bound, due to Larsen--Nelson and Alon--Klartag, holds even for nonlinear embeddings.

Vishesh Jain · 0 citations
Preprint Aug 2026

The Sharp Dimension Bound in the Johnson--Lindenstrauss Lemma

The Johnson--Lindenstrauss lemma asserts that every set of $n$ points in $d$-dimensional Euclidean space embeds into $O(\varepsilon^{-2}\log n)$-dimensional Euclidean space with distortion at most $1+\varepsilon$. Larsen and Nelson conjectured that the optimal target dimension throughout the full range of the parameters $n,d, \varepsilon$ is \[ \Theta\left(\min\left\{d,n-1,\frac{\log(2+\varepsilon^2n)}{\varepsilon^2}\right\}\right). \] We resolve this conjecture in the affirmative. In fact, we prove the stronger statement that the upper bound is attained by a linear map. The matching lower bound, due to Larsen--Nelson and Alon--Klartag, holds even for nonlinear embeddings.

Vishesh Jain · 0 citations