Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) holds significant promise for achieving human-like Autonomous Vehicle (AV) capabilities, but suffers from low sample efficiency and challenges in reward design. Model-Based Reinforcement Learning (MBRL) offers improved sample efficiency and generalizability compared to Model-Free Reinforcement Learning (MFRL) in various multi-agent decision-making scenarios. Nevertheless, MBRL faces critical difficulties in estimating uncertainty during the model learning phase, thereby limiting its scalability and applicability in real-world scenarios. Additionally, most studies on Connected Autonomous Vehicles (CAVs) focus on single-agent decision-making. In contrast, existing multi-agent MBRL solutions lack computationally tractable algorithms with Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) guarantees, a crucial factor for ensuring policy reliability with limited training data. To address these challenges, we propose MA-PMBRL, a novel Multi-Agent Pessimistic Model-Based Reinforcement Learning framework for CAVs, incorporating a max-min optimization approach to enhance robustness and decision-making. To mitigate the inherent subjectivity of uncertainty estimation in MBRL and avoid incurring catastrophic failures in AV, MA-PMBRL employs a pessimistic optimization framework combined with Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) for both model and policy learning. MA-PMBRL also employs general function approximations under partial dataset coverage to enhance learning efficiency and system-level performance. By bounding the suboptimality of the resulting policy under mild theoretical assumptions, we successfully establish PAC guarantees for MA-PMBRL, demonstrating that the proposed framework represents a significant step toward scalable, efficient, and reliable multi-agent decision-making for CAVs.
Ruo-Qi Wen, Rongpeng Li, Xing Xu et al.· IEEE Transactions on Mobile...· 1 citation
Large language model (LLM) agents provide a promising interface for command-line-based network operations, but a plausible command may still fail or introduce operational risk after execution. Existing approaches mainly focus on command generation or final configuration correctness, and do not use execution-grounded experience to jointly improve candidate coverage and action selection. We propose an execution-grounded dual-path consequence-aware agent for CLI-based SONiC operations, which generates multiple complete actions, predicts their execution consequences, and selects the final action through utility- and risk-aware reranking. The proposal-side path abstracts reusable operational lessons into retrievable guidance to improve feasible-action coverage without modifying the proposal LLM, while the selection-side path adapts the consequence predictor through session-level LoRA updates using real SSH feedback to improve conditional selection quality. Experiments over multi-turn SONiC operation sessions with different Qwen3 proposal models show that the framework improves feasible-action coverage and top-1 execution success, and that the two adaptation paths provide complementary gains over interaction.
Yuxuan Chen, Rongpeng Li, Zhifeng Zhao et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.