Recursive self-improvement (RSI) lets a system improve the model-building machinery from its own failures, so every later model inherits the gain. Yet RSI has been validated almost exclusively on coding and formal benchmarks such as science QA and mathematics. This format bound limits RSI to improvement within a machine-checkable slice, not general capability where questions are open and correctness is settled by argument, replication, or measurement. We argue RSI must next operate across real, diverse scientific, engineering, and meta-scientific domains, not where formal evaluation is merely tractable. To that end we present MetaRSI-v1, where improvement is the scheduled composition of three typed operators over one unified paradigm. Data-RSI amplifies existing competence and marks its boundary; Harness-RSI edits a five-slot scaffold without touching weights; Model-RSI internalizes capability into parameters through bounded training. Sharing one loop kernel and artifact vocabulary, they make data, scaffold, and model changes composable rather than exclusive. A two-axis optimizer jointly decides operator order and each operator's proposal policy, while a meta-level policy revises the schedule across terms. We validate MetaRSI-v1 under the field's standard evaluations, on code and closed-form science, with no external teacher: the target model plays every role in its own loop. MetaRSI-v1 reframes self-improvement from a single-surface edit to a composition across the full model-production pipeline, opening two paths: a model route internalizing capability through training, and a harness route leaving weights untouched and thus extending self-improvement to any model reachable through an interface, with Data-RSI redefined as the shared substrate feeding both. The framework further yields refutable laws on where loops exist, how operators compose, and what supervision buys.
Zi-Hang Tan, Lei-Xin Sun, Zi-Tong Shi et al.· 0 citations
It is suggested that LLMs differ not only in baseline risk disposition, but also in the risk signals they respond to and the flexibility with which they adjust, providing a behavioural basis for auditing risk-sensitive decision-making in interactive settings.
Xuan-Kun Rong, Wenke Huang, Bo Du et al.· arXiv.org· 0 citations
This work shows that scenario-wrapped prompts activate internal scenario directions whose causal steering consistently reduces refusal scores, and proposes Concept2Scenario, a concept-based attribution framework for vulnerable scenario discovery that instantiates a broad concept space with a sparse autoencoder, translates the identified concepts into interpretable natural-language scenarios, and identifies synergistic scenario combinations through interaction attribution.
ReFrame is a training-free multimodal input reframing framework where two agents share a lightweight locally deployed MLLM: the evidence-generation agent constructs complementary risk and utility evidence, and the rewrite-and-routing agent converts it into a safe proxy prompt and image-routing decision before calling the downstream MLLM, without modifying it or accessing its internal information.
Wenzheng Jiang, Xuan-Kun Rong, Yuan-Zhao Zhai et al.· 0 citations
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.