Automated prediction markets require sponsors to prefund liquidity before observing order flow, creating a financing challenge at launch. We study whether nonnegative charges conditioned on observable payoff direction can improve recovery of this prefunded capital while limiting their effect on informed participation. We develop Seed Capital Flow (SCF), a direction-conditioned levy, in a stylized binary cost-function market with informed and liquidity-motivated traders. When order composition differs across directions, SCF concentrates the permitted fee burden on the direction with relatively more liquidity-motivated flow, whereas a uniform fee spreads it across both directions. Under a sufficiently tight common retention constraint, this allocation yields higher expected recovery capacity and can make additional liquidity choices financially viable. Synthetic numerical audits examine robustness to alternative flow patterns, stochastic arrivals, and label misspecification. The results characterize a mechanism-design tradeoff rather than an empirical prediction: the market remains prefunded, recovery is expected rather than guaranteed, and the analysis is limited to an opening-cohort setting.
Yankai Chen, Bowei He, Zhuohan Xie et al.· 1 citation
Financial NLP systems produce probabilistic forecasts from news, reports, and filings. Prediction markets can aggregate these forecasts sequentially, but their fees must reward information without overcharging low-risk updates. Existing quadratic-fee mechanisms use a state-blind bound, while a local-curvature envelope remains conservative because it prices every trade at the largest permitted span. We introduce SpanPM, a prediction-market mechanism that sets the local-curvature multiplier from each trade's realized payoff spread. Its fee dominates exact Bregman exposure trade by trade, preserves no arbitrage, information incorporation, expressiveness, and bounded worst-case loss, and yields a tighter overcharge factor approaching one as trade span vanishes. Repeated global best responses converge to a common belief and become full Newton steps locally, giving quadratic rather than damped-linear convergence. We implement a deterministic bounded one-dimensional multi-basin search, audited against a dense grid. Across paired synthetic experiments, SpanPM improves 20-round consensus error by several orders of magnitude over a fixed-envelope local baseline under the same hard cap. With evolving beliefs, it preserves 96--97\% of the trader surplus achieved with exact Bregman fees while cutting excess fees by 94\% relative to the global quadratic mechanism. These results establish a trade-adaptive prediction-market mechanism for sequential aggregation of probabilistic financial forecasts.
Yankai Chen, Rassul Magauin, Bowei He et al.· 1 citation
BPO is instantiate as Branching Policy Optimization (BPO), a sandbox-native RL algorithm that adaptively snapshots the sandbox at high-entropy decision points along a backbone trajectory, and proves this estimator is unbiased and has strictly lower variance than the trajectory-level baseline, with the reduction equal to the prefix-explained portion of return variance.
Bowei He, Yankai Chen, Xiaokun Zhang et al.· 1 citation
FinMMEval 2026 Task 1 evaluates multilingual financial multiple-choice question answering in English, Chinese, Arabic, and Hindi. The task tests whether systems can select the correct answer to finance questions involving domain terminology, numerical interpretation, and conceptual financial reasoning across languages and scripts. The final-test set contains 800 questions, with 200 questions per language; gold answers were withheld during submission, and each language was ranked independently by accuracy. The final leaderboards contain 13 English, 11 Chinese, 11 Arabic, and 10 Hindi ranked submissions. Top accuracies range from 92.0% in Hindi to 97.5% in English and Arabic, with the same leading teams appearing near the top across all four languages. The documented systems used retrieval augmentation, direct answer-option scoring, language-specific prompting, selective self-consistency, confidence checks, and LLM-based review stages.
Zhuohan Xie, Yu-Yang Dai, R. Elbadry et al.· arXiv.org· 1 citation
We use cookies to run the site and, with your consent, for analytics and to show ads.
See our Cookie Policy.
